Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 352 Kant
Judgement Date : 5 January, 2023
-1-
R.P. No.748 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. VISHWAJITH SHETTY
REVIEW PETITION NO.748 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY ITS REVENUE SECRETARY
VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU 560 001.
Digitally signed 2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION
by RUPA V 8th FLOOR, KANDAYA BHAVAN
Location: High K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU 560 009.
Court of
Karnataka
3. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR
SHIVAJINAGAR, KANDAYA BHAVAN
I FLOOR, K.G. ROAD
BENGALURU 560 001.
4. THE SENIOR SUB REGISTRAR
BANASWADI
BENGALURU 560 043.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. LAXMI NARAYANA, AGA)
AND:
1. S.P. GAYATHRI
W/O LATE D.A. THIMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS.
2. SRI. D.T. SRIKANTH
S/O LATE D A THIMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS.
3. SRI. D.T. ARAVIND
S/O LATE D A THIMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS.
-2-
R.P. No.748 of 2022
4. SRI. D.T AVINASH
S/O LATE D A THIMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS.
5. SRI. D.T. RAJASHEKAR
S/O LATE D A THIMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS.
ALL ARE RESIDING AT NEAR
VENUGOPALA SWAMY TEMPLE
DEVASANDRA MAIN ROAD
K R PURAM, BENGALURU EAST TALUK
BENGALURU 560 036.
REP BY THEIR REGISTERED GENERAL
POWER OF ATTORNEY
SRI. AMITH R. JAIN
S/O SRI. RIKABCHAND JAIN
AGED 48 YEARS
R/AT NO.401
PANCHASHEEL APARTMENTS
3rd FLOOR, THIRD CROSS
GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU 09.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. D.N. MANJUNATH, ADV., FOR R1-R5)
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47
RULE 1 R/W SECTION 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE
ORDER DATED 28/09/2022 PASSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT
IN W.A.NO.618/2022 (GM.ST/RN), IN THE INTEREST OF
JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING,
THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
R.P. No.748 of 2022
ORDER
Mr.Laxminarayana, learned Additional Government
Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.D.N.Manjunath, learned counsel for the
respondents.
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
This petition has been filed seeking review of the
judgment dated 28.09.2022 passed in W.A.No.618/2022.
2. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, we
find that the order neither suffers from any jurisdictional
infirmity nor any error apparent on the face of the record
warranting interference of this Court in exercise of review
jurisdiction.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE RV
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!