Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9669 Kant
Judgement Date : 7 December, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:44451
RFA No. 942 of 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 942 OF 2008 (SP)
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. NANJAMMA,
W/O. LATE SRI. CHIKKANNA,
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS.
2. SRI. BASAVARAJ,
S/O. LATE SRI. CHIKKANNA,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS.
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT
KODIGEHALLI, YELAHANKA HOBLI,
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI: C. PRADEEP, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
1. SRI. VENKATAPPA,
Digitally signed
by PAVITHRA N S/O. SRI. PUTTAIAH
Location: High (PUJARI ANNAMMADEVI TEMPLE)
Court Of AGED 70 YEARS,
Karnataka
2. SRI. RAMA,
S/O. SRI. VENKATAPPA,
AGED 50 YEARS,
3. SRI. JAGADISH,
S/O. SRI. VENKATAPPA,
AGED 45 YEARS,
4. SRI. MANJU,
S/O. SRI. VENKATAPPA,
AGED 40 YEARS,
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:44451
RFA No. 942 of 2008
5. SMT. JAYAMMA,
W/O. SRI. VENKATAPPA
AGED 65 YEARS.
ALL ARE RESIDING AT
KODIGEHALLI, HELAHANKA HOBLI,
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI: M.N. BALAKRISHNA, ADVOCATE
FOR C/RESPONDENTS CP NO.567/98)
THIS RFA FILED U/S 96 OF THE CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT
AND DECREE DT. 9.4.08 PASSED IN OS NO.3818/91 ON THE FILE OF
THE XI ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE
SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE OF SALE AGREEMENT.
THIS RFA, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Case called twice. None appears on behalf of the
appellants.
2. The order sheet discloses that the appellants are
not interested in prosecuting the appeal diligently.
On 09.06.2023, this Court granted a week's time for the
appellants to address the arguments noting non appearance on
behalf of the appellants.
3. Again on 11.07.2023, there was no representation
and the matter was adjourned.
NC: 2023:KHC:44451
4. On 12.10.2023 also there was no representation
and this Court suo-moto adjourned the matter. Even on
22.11.2023, there was no representation on behalf of the
appellants.
5. The present appeal arises against dismissal of the
suit filed by the plaintiffs in the year 1991. Even after lapse of
32 years, the plaintiffs/appellants are not interested in
prosecuting the appeal.
Hence, left with no alternative, the appeal stands
dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
PN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!