Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shri Surappa S/O Dhanappa Ghadi Since ... vs The State Of Karnataka
2023 Latest Caselaw 9554 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9554 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 December, 2023

Karnataka High Court

Shri Surappa S/O Dhanappa Ghadi Since ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 December, 2023

Author: S.Sunil Dutt Yadav

Bench: S.Sunil Dutt Yadav

                                                      -1-
                                                      NC: 2023:KHC-D:14261-DB
                                                              WA No. 100645 of 2023




                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
                                            DHARWAD BENCH
                              DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
                                                PRESENT
                             THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV
                                                      AND
                             THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL
                                 WRIT APPEAL NO. 100645 OF 2023 (LR-)
                      BETWEEN:
                      1.   SHRI SURAPPA S/O DHANAPPA GHADI
                           SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS.

                           SHRI RAJARAM S/O SURAPPA GHADI
                           AGE. 55 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,
                           R/O. HONKAL, TQ. KHANAPUR,
                           DIST. BELAGAVI 591120.
                      2.   SMT. SUMITRA W/O JYOTIBA GHADI
                           AGE. 44 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE HOLD
                           AND AGRICULTURE, R/O. HONKAL,
                           TQ. KHANAPUR, DIST. BELAGAVI 591120.

                      3.   SHRI YALLAPPA S/O DHANAPPA GHADI
                           AGE. 42 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,
SHIVAKUMAR
HIREMATH                   R/O. HONKAL, TQ. KHANAPUR,
Digitally signed by
                           DIST. BELAGAVI 591120.
SHIVAKUMAR
HIREMATH                                                                ...APPELLANTS
Date: 2023.12.11
16:29:13 +0530        (BY SRI. B M PATIL, ADVOCATE)


                      AND:
                      1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                           REVENUE DEPARTMENT R/BY
                           ITS SECRETARY, VIDHAN SOUDHA,
                           BENGALURU 560001

                      2.   THE LAND TRIBUNAL KHANAPUR
                           R/BY ITS CHAIRMAN, TQ. KHANAPUR,
                               -2-
                              NC: 2023:KHC-D:14261-DB
                                     WA No. 100645 of 2023




     DIST. BELAGAVI 591302.

3.   THE THASILDAR KHANAPUR
     TQ. KHANAPUR, DIST. BELGAVI.
     PIN CODE 591302

4.   SHRI. JIVAJI S/O GAJANAN DESHPANDE
     AGE. MAJOR, R/O. KOCHERI BUILDING,
     ANGOL MAL, BELAGAVI,
     TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI 590006
                                               ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. GIRIJA HIREMATH, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3)

     THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S.4 OF KARNATAKA HIGH
COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING THIS HON BLE COURT TO, SET ASIDE
THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 13-07-2023 PASSED BY THE
LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN W.P.NO.104199/2023 (LR) AND
QUASHED IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY 2ND RESPONDENT LAND
TRIBUNAL KHANAPUR IN KLR.OCP.SR.580/74 KHANAPUR DATED 18-
09-1975 AT VIDE ANNEXURE-F.

     THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY,
S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

                        JUDGMENT

This appeal is filed calling in question the correctness

of the order passed by the learned Single Judge in

W.P.No.104199/2023 disposed of on 13.07.2023.

2. Learned Single Judge has dismissed the petition

on the ground of delay and laches while noticing that the

order impugned was the order dated 18.07.1975 of the

Land Tribunal. The Tribunal by its order at Annexure-F

NC: 2023:KHC-D:14261-DB

had reserved liberty to the petitioner's father Surappa

Dhanppa Gadi to approach the competent authority for

disposal of his case while observing that it is a Inam land

and it cannot be decided by the Tribunal under Section

141 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

3. Learned Single Judge has noticed that the order

that was challenged was of the year 1975 and that the

father of the petitioner had died on 09.09.1989 and during

his lifetime, Surappa had not chosen to challenge the

impugned order and also found that the averments made

in the writ petition do not offer any satisfactory

explanation for the inordinate delay of 48 years in filing of

the writ petition.

4. Perused the order at Annexure-F which is

passed on 18.09.1975.

5. Admittedly, the order was passed on the

application of Surappa Dhanappa Gadi. From the facts

NC: 2023:KHC-D:14261-DB

made out, the said Surappa died on 09.09.1989 which fact

is not undisputed.

6. Perused the paragraph 6 of the writ petition.

The averments made do not offer any explanation as to

when the legal representatives of the deceased Surapa

discovered regarding the order of the Tribunal at

Annexure-F. It is to be noticed that delay and laches in

challenging the order of the year 1975 by 48 years cannot

be overlooked without any substantive ground made out.

Matters which have settled by lapse of time cannot be

rejuvenated by condoning the delay of 48 years.

Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed and the order of

the learned Single Judge is confirmed.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

JUDGE

NAA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter