Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

P. Gokuldas Bhat vs Sri. Laxmi Venkatramana Temple
2023 Latest Caselaw 9045 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9045 Kant
Judgement Date : 1 December, 2023

Karnataka High Court

P. Gokuldas Bhat vs Sri. Laxmi Venkatramana Temple on 1 December, 2023

                                            -1-
                                                     NC: 2023:KHC:43334
                                                    RSA No. 642 of 2023




                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                      DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023

                                          BEFORE

                  THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM

                     REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.642 OF 2023 (INJ)

             BETWEEN:

             1.    P.GOKULDAS BHAT
                   S/O P.SADASHIVA BHAT
                   AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS

             2.    K.RAJESH PRABHU
                   S/O LATE K.VASUDEVA PRABHU
                   AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

             3.    K.YOGISH PRABHU
                   S/O LATE K.VASUDEVA PRABHU
                   AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS

Digitally
                   ALL ARE RESIDING AT
signed by
CHAITHRA A         NEAR ULLAS BAR AND RESTAURANT
Location:          UPPINANGADY VILLAGE
HIGH               PUTTUR TALUK
COURT OF           D.K.-574 201
KARNATAKA
                                                        ...APPELLANTS
             (BY SRI. RAJASHEKAR S, ADVOCATE)

             AND:

                   SRI. LAXMI VENKATRAMANA TEMPLE
                   UPPINANGADY
                   PUTTUR TALUK,
                                  -2-
                                                 NC: 2023:KHC:43334
                                                RSA No. 642 of 2023




    D.K.-574 201
    REPRESENTED BY ITS
    MANAGING TRUSTEE


                                                   ...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. SACHIN B S, ADVOCATE)

     THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC AGAINST
THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.02.2023 PASSED IN
RA NO.10/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL, SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PUTTUR DISMISSING THE APPEAL
AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
23.03.2021 PASSED IN O.S. NO.408/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE
PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PUTTUR, D.K AND ETC.


     THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PART HEARD IN
ADMISSION,     THIS   DAY,   THE       COURT      DELIVERED    THE
FOLLOWING:

                          JUDGMENT

On the previous date of hearing though the

appellants are called upon to file undertaking by way of

affidavits indicating that they will handover vacant

possession within eight months, but the undertaking filed

in the form of affidavits indicating that they would

handover the vacant possession within nine months from

NC: 2023:KHC:43334

today runs contrary to what was agreed on the previous

date.

2. Therefore, the undertaking by way of affidavits

furnished before this Court are rejected.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants

would submit to this Court that appropriate undertaking

will be filed within 10 days from today. Appellants would

also accept the request made by the learned counsel

appearing for the plaintiffs insofar as arrears of rent is

concerned. On instructions, he has made a statement that

his clients would make arrangements to pay arrears.

4. Therefore, ten days time is granted to the

appellants to file an undertaking that he would handover

vacant possession within nine months i.e., on or before

31.07.2024.

NC: 2023:KHC:43334

5. It is made clear that they shall also give

undertaking indicating that all arrears of rent will be paid

within a period of six months.

6. The appellants shall also indicate in the

affidavits that they will not commit any default in paying

the agreed rent and the same shall be reflected in the

undertaking. The undertaking to be tendered within

10 days.

In the light of the undertaking given by the

appellants, the second appeal stands disposed off.

It is made clear that the appellants shall not seek

any further extension of time and the same shall be

indicated in the Affidavits.

Sd/-

JUDGE

NBM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter