Karnataka High Court
S G Krishna Murthy vs Sri Krishnappa Since Deceased By Legal ... on 21 December, 2023
Author: V Srishananda
Bench: V Srishananda
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:46917
RFA No. 1000 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1000 OF 2014 (RES)
BETWEEN:
S G KRISHNA MURTHY
S/O LATE S GUNDAPPA
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
FLAT NO.1, GROUND FLOOR
Y N RESIDENCY, 7TH MAIN
4TH PHASE, RAJEEV NAGAR
B V N LAYOUT
BANGALORE- 560 085
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI ZULFIKIR KUMAR SHAFI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI KRISHNAPPA
SINCE DECEASED BY LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES
1(a) SMT K SUBBAMMA
Digitally W/O SRI MUGULAPPA
signed by R AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
MANJUNATHA
Location:
D/O LATE KRISHNAPPA
HIGH COURT
OF 1(b) SMT K JAYAMMA
KARNATAKA
W/O KRISHNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
D/O LATE KRISHNAPPA
BOTH 1(a) and (b) RESIDING AT
O.B.CHUDANAHALLI
KAGGALIPURA CIRCLE
UTTARAHALLI HOBLI
BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK - 560 062
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:46917
RFA No. 1000 of 2014
1(c) SMT S RENUKA
W/O SUBRAMANYAM
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
1(d) MAST S R HINDU KUMAR
S/O SUBRAMANYAM
AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS
1(e) MISS S R ROHINI
D/O SUBRAMANYAM
AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS
1(c) and (e) ARE
RESIDING AT NO.325
11TH CROSS, SHAKAMBARI NAGAR
J P NAGAR 1ST PHASE
BANGALORE -560 078
1(f) SMT K LAKSHMI
W/O GOVINDARAJU
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
D/O LATE KRISHNAPPA
RESIDING AT O B CHUDANAHALLI
KAGGALIPURA CIRCLE
UTTARAHALLI HOBLI
BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK 560 002
1(g) SRI K MANJUNATH
S/O KRISHNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
1(h) SRI K RAMESH
S/O KRISHNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
1(g) AND 1(h) ARE RESIDING AT
NO.325, 11TH CROSS
SHAKAMBARI NAGAR
J P NAGAR 1ST PHASE
BANGALORE 560 078
-3-
NC: 2023:KHC:46917
RFA No. 1000 of 2014
1(i) SMT K RUKMINI
D/O LATE KRISHNAPPA
W/O SRI D VENKATESH
WARULU
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
NATHAM KANDRIGA VILLAGE
VASUDHEVA PURAM
NAGRI POST,
CHITTOR DITRICT
ANDHRA PRADESH 517590
2. M S SURYANARAYAN SETTY
S/O SRI SANJEEVAIAH
SETTY
NO.376, 10TH CROSS
2ND BLOCK, JAYANAGAR
BANGALORE -560 011
3. B NARAYANA
S/O SRI BACHE GOWDA
NO.35, 5TH CROSS
MYSORE ROAD
OLD GUDDADAHALLI
BANGALORE 560026
4. B JAYARAM
S/O SRI BACHE GOWDA
NO.35, 5TH CROSS
MYSORE ROAD
OLD GUDDADAHALLI
BANGALORE 560026
5. R SRINIVASA MURTHY
S/O SRI RAMU
NO.272, MYSORE ROAD
BANGALORE -560 026
6. V RAJAGOPALA SETTY
S/O SRI VENKATARAMAIAH
SETTY
NO.15/3, WEST CIRCLE ROAD
-4-
NC: 2023:KHC:46917
RFA No. 1000 of 2014
VISVESWARAPURAM
BANGALORE 560004
7. DR MUTHYUNJAYA
S/O SRI S M NANJUNDAPPA
NO.32, 3RD CROSS
THYAGARAJANAGAR
BANGALORE 560 028
8. B GOPI NAIDU
S/O SRI R V NAIDU
NO.107/4, 3RD BLOCK
THYAGARAJANAGAR
BANGALORE 560028
9. SRI RAMULU NAIDU
S/O SRI R V NAIDU
NO.107/4
3RD BLOCK
THYAGARAJANAGAR
BANGALORE -560028
10. SMT C SHIVAMMA
W/O SRI MRUTHYUNJAYA
NO.32
SWASTHI 3RD CROSS
SHANTHINAGAR
BANGALORE 560027
11. VYASARAJ
S/O NOT KNOWN
MAJOR
12. RANGANATH
S/O NOT KNOWN
MAJOR
13. SAMSHIR
S/O NOT KNOWN
MAJOR
-5-
NC: 2023:KHC:46917
RFA No. 1000 of 2014
14. YETHIRAJ
S/O NOT KNOWN
MAJOR
15. SHIVARUDRAPPA
S/O NOT KNOWN
MAJOR
16. SAMBHASHIVAIAH
S/O NOT KNOWN
MAJOR
17. SRINIDHI
S/O NOT KNOWN
MAJOR
18. SUSHEEL
S/O NOT KNOWN
MAJOR
19. SHIVAMMA
W/O NOT KNOWN
MAJOR
RESPONDENTS NO.11 TO 19 ARE
RESIDING AT
KATHRIGUPPA VILLAGE
UTTARAHALLI HOBLI
BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK -560 062
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI Y K NARAYANA SHARMA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1;
R2 TO R19 NOTICE DISPENSED WITH;
R1(A), R1(B) ARE SERVED; R1(G) ABATED;
R1(I) SERVICE HELD SUFFICIENT;
R1(C), (D), (E), (F) UNSERVED)
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION
96 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND
ORDER DATED 16.06.2014 PASSED IN EX.NO.1558/1998 ON
THE FILE OF THE XIX-ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
-6-
NC: 2023:KHC:46917
RFA No. 1000 of 2014
JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY, REJECTING THE APPLICATION FILED
U/O-21, RULE-97, 99 AND 100 R/W SEC.151 OF CPC.
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS,
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Memo with acknowledgment has been filed for having
paid costs of Rs.500/-.
Paper books are not filed.
Cost was imposed for non filing of paper books. Despite
the same, paper books are not filed.
Accordingly, appeal stands dismissed for non
prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
kcm
