Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 11284 Kant
Judgement Date : 20 December, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:46501-DB
RFA No. 1713/2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K V ARAVIND
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1713/2010 (DEC)
BETWEEN:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY
TO GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-01
2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
PWD DIVISION
CHITRADURGA - 577 701 ... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. BASAVARAJ GODACHI, AGA)
AND:
M N LOKESH
S/O LATE M S NANJAPPA GOWDA
Digitally
signed by K S AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
RENUKAMBA CONTRACTOR BY PROFESSION
Location: HINDU,
High Court of
Karnataka R/O BEHIND SRIRAJ THEATRE
SRINAGAR, TUMKUR - 572 102 ...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.PRADEEP KUMAR R.H., ADVOCATE FOR
SRI.SHANMUKHAPPA, ADVOCATE)
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF
CPC, SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
21.12.2009 PASSED IN O.S.25/2003 ON THE FILE OF THE I-ADDL.
CIVIL JUDGE (SR. DN), CHITRADURGA, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR
DECLARATION AND RECOVERY OF MONEY.
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:46501-DB
RFA No. 1713/2010
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
K.S.MUDAGAL J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Sri Pradeep Kumar. R.H, learned Counsel submits vakalat
for Sri. A.B Channabasavaiah the Special Power of Attorney
Holder of the respondent along with the copy of the Special
Power of Attorney. The same is taken on record.
2. Sri T.S Mallikarjuna, the Executive
Engineer/appellant No.2, Sri. A.B Channabasavaiah the Special
Power of Attorney Holder of the respondent and both side
Counsel are present.
3. Heard the parties and perused the mediation report
and memorandum of settlement submitted by the Bengaluru
Mediation Centre.
4. Parties admit that they have voluntarily executed
the memorandum of settlement and terms of the same.
5. As per the terms of the memorandum of
settlement, the respondent has agreed to receive
Rs.35,08,878/ plus GST applicable on that on or before
08.03.2024 and the appellant has agreed to refund EMD and
security deposit of Rs.2,78,000/- to the respondent on or
NC: 2023:KHC:46501-DB
before 08.03.2024. The respondent has accepted for the said
amount in full settlement of his claim.
6. Memorandum of settlement is found admissible
under the law. Therefore the same is recorded. The appeal
deserves to be allowed in terms of the memorandum of
settlement. Hence the following:
ORDER
The appeal is allowed.
The impugned judgment and decree is hereby set aside.
The suit in O.S.No.25/2003 on the file of the I-Additional
Civil Judge (Senior Division), Chitradurga is decreed in terms of
memorandum of settlement submitted by the parties.
Draw decree accordingly.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
PKN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!