Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 11279 Kant
Judgement Date : 20 December, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:46539
MFA No. 351 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 351 OF 2015 (MV-I)
BETWEEN:
SRI. M. SUDHAKARA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
S/O SRI MUNISWAMY REDDY,
RESIDENT OF CHIKALANERPU VILLAGE & HOBLI,
CHINTHAMANI TALUK.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. KRISHNA KISHORE S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SMT. RAMAKKA
SINCE DECEASED REPRESENTED BY LRS.,
2. SRI. NARAYANAPPA
Digitally signed
by VINUTHA B S AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
S/O LATE SUBBARAYAPPA,
KARNATAKA
3. SRI. VENKATARAVANAPPA
AGED ABOTU 39 YEARS
S/O. LATE SUBBRAYAPPA
BOTH R2 AND R3 ARE RESIDENTS OF
YENIGADALE VILLAGE, CHILAKALANERPU HOBLI,
CHITHAMANI TALUK,CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT.
4. MR. ASHOK REDDY,
MAJOR, S/O N. PULLA REDDY,
RESIDING AT NO.1/419, MARUTHI NAGAR,
CUDDAPAH DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:46539
MFA No. 351 of 2015
5. SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO., LTD.,
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE, 101-105,
SHIVA CHAMBERS, SEEFUR, II CBO,
BELAPUR,NAVI MUMBAI-400 614
BY ITS BRANCH OFFICE,
STFC COM LTD., KOLAR BRANCH,
KOLAR (NEAR SRINIVAS NURSING HOME,MB ROAD).
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.M. SRINIVASA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3;
VIDE ORDER DATED 20/12/2021,
SERVICE ON R4 HELD SUFFICIENT;
VIDE ORDER DATED 07/10/2021,
R2 AND R3 ARE TREATED AS LRS OF DECEASED R1;
R5 SERVED)
THIS MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 18.08.2014 PASSED IN
MVC NO.9/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, &
JMFC, MACT, CHINTHAMANI, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF
Rs.4,72,000/- WITH INTEREST @ 6% P.A. FROM THE DATE OF
ORDER TILL DEPOSIT IN TRIBUNAL.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Heard Sri.Krishna Kishore S., learned counsel for the
appellant as well as Sri.G.M.Srinivasa Reddy, learned counsel
for respondents No.2 and 3.
2. Compromise petition is filed by both the parties.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned
counsel appearing for respondents No.2 and 3 seeks to record
NC: 2023:KHC:46539
the compromise arrived at between the parties and dispose of
the appeal accordingly.
4. Gone through the contents of the terms of
compromise. As the compromise arrived at is found not to be
unlawful, this Court considers desirable to record the
compromise as prayed for.
5. Hence, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the
compromise arrived at between the parties. The terms of
compromise shall form part of record.
6. The amount if any deposited and is in credit of this
Court be transmitted to the concerned Tribunal immediately.
Sd/-
JUDGE
AP CT:TSM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!