Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10170 Kant
Judgement Date : 11 December, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:44856
RFA No. 1033 of 2007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1033 OF 2007 (SP)
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. M. POORNIMA M. SHAH
W/O MANISH C. SHAH
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
R/OF NO.228, 68TH CROSS
5TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR
BAGNALROE-560 010.
Digitally
signed by R 2. SRI. MANISH C. SHAH
MANJUNATHA
S/O CHAMANLAL H. SHAH
Location:
HIGH COURT AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
OF R/OF NO.228, 68TH CROSS
KARNATAKA
5TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR
BAGNALROE-560 010.
...APPELLANTS
(A1 AND A2 ABSENT)
AND:
1. SMT. GANGAMMA
SINCE DEAD BY HER LRS.
a) SRI. PARAMASHIVAIAH
S/O LATE GUARD SIDDALINGAIAH
AGED 51 YEARS, OCC:PEON
VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001.
b) SRI. PANCHAKSHARI
S/O LATE GUARD SIDDALINGAIAH
AGED 46 YEARS
R/O HULIKERE VILLAGE
DODDABALLAPURA TQ-561228.
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:44856
RFA No. 1033 of 2007
c) SRI. ADAVISHAIAH
S/O LATE GUARD SIDDALINGAIAH
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
R/O HULIKERE VILLAGE
DODDABALLAPUR TQ-561228.
d) SRI. SHIVAKUMAR
S/O LATE GUARD SIDDALINGAIAH
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
NO.6, LAKSHMINARAYANANAGAR
RMV II STAGE, MLA LAYOUT
SANJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 094.
e) SRI. MRUTHYUNJAYA
S/O LATE GUARD SIDDALINGAIAH
AGED 34 YEARS
R/O HULIKERE VILLAGE
DODDABALLAPUR TQ-561228.
f) SMT. SIDDAGANGAMMA
W/O SRI. CHANNAPPA
D/O LATE GANGAMMA
MAJOR, R/AT 2ND MAIN, 6TH CROSS
HOUSING BOARD, BANGALORE-560 064.
g) SMT. GOWRAMMA
D/O LATE GANGAMMA
W/O SRI. MALLIKARJUNAIAH
MAJOR, R/AT 16TH CROSS
KENKEREPALYA, BANGALORE-560022.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. NINGE GOWDA, ADV., FOR C/R1 (a to e & g)
V/O DTD:19.04.2021 APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS
ABATED AGAINST R1 (f))
THIS RFA IS FILED U/S 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.10.2006 PASSED IN
OS.NO.65/2002 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.)
DODDABALLAPUR, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR SPECIFIC
PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT.
-3-
NC: 2023:KHC:44856
RFA No. 1033 of 2007
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Court notice issued to appellant Nos.1 and 2 returned
with an endorsement 'service held sufficient'.
2. Earlier, the appellants were represented by learned
counsel Sri.Jose Sabastian who filed memo of retirement. The
same was accepted.
3. By abundant caution, this Court issued Court notice.
Despite Court notice being issued, the appellants have not
chosen to appear and address their arguments.
Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed for non-
prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
RV
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!