Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sharanabasayya S/O Neelayya And Ors vs The Special Land Acquisition Officer
2023 Latest Caselaw 10156 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10156 Kant
Judgement Date : 11 December, 2023

Karnataka High Court

Sharanabasayya S/O Neelayya And Ors vs The Special Land Acquisition Officer on 11 December, 2023

Author: R.Devdas

Bench: R.Devdas

                                                 -1-
                                                   NC: 2023:KHC-K:9144-DB
                                                         RP No. 200061 of 2021




                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
                                         KALABURAGI BENCH

                            DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023

                                              PRESENT

                                 THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS
                                                 AND
                                 THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI

                                REVIEW PETITION NO. 200061 OF 2021
                                                 IN
                                    M.F.A.NO.7887 OF 2004 (LAC)
                       BETWEEN:

                       1.   SHARANABASAYYA S/O NEELAYYA
                            AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE
                            R/O CHENNUR, TQ. CHINCHOLI
                            DIST. KALABURAGI.

                       2.   SHARANAMMA W/O NEELAYYA
                            AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD
                            R/O CHENNUR, TQ. CHINCHOLI
                            DIST. KALABURAGI.
Digitally signed by
VARSHA N
RASALKAR               3.   PARWATI W/O NEELAYYA
Location: High Court        AGE: 76 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD
Of Karnataka
                            R/O CHENNUR, TQ. CHINCHOLI
                            DIST. KALABURAGI.
                                                            ...REVIEW PETITIONERS

                       (BY SRI.HARSHAVARDHAN R. MALIPATIL, ADVOCATE)
                       AND:

                       THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
                       MAJOR AND MIP PROJECT,
                       KALABURAGI - 585 102.
                                                                  ...RESPONDENT
                       (BY SRI.MALLIKARJUN C. BASAREDDY, GOVT. ADVOCATE)
                                 -2-
                                  NC: 2023:KHC-K:9144-DB
                                        RP No. 200061 of 2021




     THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 114
READ WTH ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW
THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN
M.F.A.NO.7887 OF 2004 AND CONSEQUENTLY AWARD OF
RS.64,000/- PER ACRE IN RESPECT OF IRRIGATED LAND WITH
ALL STATUTORY BENEFITS AND COST, IN THE INTEREST OF
JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
R.DEVDAS J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                               ORDER

R. DEVDAS J., (ORAL):

This review petition has been filed by the appellants

in M.F.A.No.7887/2004 which was disposed of on

18.08.2008 based on a judgment and award passed in

M.F.A.No.7498/2006.

2. Learned Counsel for the petitioners has brought

to our notice several such orders passed in review

petitions. Two of the most recent ones are in

R.P.No.200013/2018 dated 15.02.2019 and

R.P.No.200015/2014 dated 23.08.2019. This Court

accepted the contentions of the review petitioners and

held that there cannot be discrimination in payment of

compensation amongst similarly situated land owners. It

NC: 2023:KHC-K:9144-DB

was also noticed that the compensation in respect of

irrigated lands has been enhanced to Rs.1,72,630/- per

acre and in respect of dry lands, it was enhanced to

Rs.1,15,085/- per acre. In that view of the matter, the

review petitions were allowed while restoring the

Miscellaneous First Appeals. In fact, it is brought to the

notice of this Court that after restoration,

M.F.A.No.11585/2005 has been disposed of by order dated

15.02.2019.

3. Of course, there being an inordinate delay of

4206 days in filing the review petition, as was directed in

such other review petitions, the review petitioners shall

not be entitled for payment of interest not only during the

delayed period of 4206 days in filing the review petition

but the appellants shall also not be entitled for interest

from the date of judgment and award passed in M.F.A.No.

7887/2004 dated 18.08.2008 till date i.e., 11.12.2023.

Accordingly, I.A.No.1/2021 for condonation of delay is

NC: 2023:KHC-K:9144-DB

allowed. Delay is condoned. In that view of the matter, we

are required to allow the review petition.

4. Accordingly, the review petition is allowed with

costs. The judgment and award dated 18.08.2008 passed

in M.F.A.No.7887/2004 is recalled. The appeal in

M.F.A.No.7887/2004 is restored to its original file.

5. The appellants shall not be entitled for

payment of interest not only during the delayed period of

4206 days in filing the review petition but the appellants

shall also not be entitled for interest from the date of

judgment and award dated 18.08.2008 passed in

M.F.A.No.7887/2004, till date i.e., 11.12.2023.

6. List M.F.A.No.7887/2004 on 19.12.2023.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

JUDGE VNR CT:VK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter