Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5902 Kant
Judgement Date : 23 August, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:30064
RSA No. 1655 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1655 OF 2021 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. UMADEVI
W/O LATE SHADAKSHARAPPA
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
HOUSE HOLD
2. SRI BASAVESHA
S/O LATE SHADAKSHARAPPA
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
CIVIL ENGINEER
3. SRI VEERESH
S/O LATE SHADAKSHARAPPA
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
RESIDING AT
Digitally signed
by SHARANYA T ALL APPELLANTS ARE RESIDING
Location: HIGH AT NEAR KALIKAMBA TEMPLE
COURT OF BEHIND MAHARANI'S COLLEGE
KARNATAKA
KAMANABHAVI EXTENSION
CHITRADURGA -577 501
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI T. SESHAGIRI RAO, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI MOHAMMED EAJAZ AHAMED
S/O LATE MOHMMED GOUSE
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
BUSINESS MAN
RESIDING AT DOOR NO.1542
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:30064
RSA No. 1655 of 2021
ASSAR MOHALLA
CHITRADURGA-577501.
2. CITY MUNICIPALITY
CHITRADURGA
REPRESENT BY ITS COMMISSIONER
CHITRADURGA -577501
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI M.A. HUMAYUN, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SMT. SINCHANA M.R., ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.12.2020
PASSED IN R.A.NO.57/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE II
ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, CHITRADURGA,
DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT
AND DECREE DATED 15.06.2019 PASSED IN O.S.NO.301/2010
ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,
CHITRADURGA.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This matter was referred to the Bangalore Mediation
Centre and the same is settled. Copy of the settlement dated
22.8.2023 and Memorandum of Settlement Deed under Section
89 of CPC is also placed before the Court and in terms of
settlement, Demand Draft of Rs.6,00,000/- is handed over to
respondent No.1 before the Court and acknowledged the same
and the said Demand Draft is paid by the appellants.
NC: 2023:KHC:30064 RSA No. 1655 of 2021
2. The respective parties and their counsels are present
before the Court. The counsel for respondent No.2 is also
present before the Court.
3. In view of the settlement arrived at between the
parties i.e. appellants and respondent No.1, the appeal is
disposed of in terms of the settlement.
4. In view of the settlement arrived at between the
parties, Registry is directed to refund the court fee in favour of
any one of the appellants on proper identification, in
accordance with law.
Sd/-
JUDGE AP
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!