Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5810 Kant
Judgement Date : 21 August, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:29604-DB
MFA No. 6069 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.NARENDAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6069 OF 2022 (FC)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI G R RAVI KUMAR,
S/O K G RAJAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
Digitally signed OCC: AGRICULTURIST.
by YAMUNA K L
Location: High
Court of 2. K G RAJAPPA,
Karnataka S/O BASAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURIST.
3. G R VENKATESH,
S/O K G RAJAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURIST.
4. SMT. BASAMMA
W/O K G RAJAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
OCC: HOUSEHOLD (AGRICULTURIST).
ALL ARE RESIDING AT:
R/O: KABBURU VILLAGE,
RAMAGONDANAHALLI POST,
DAVANAGERE TALUK AND DISTRICT.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR G M., ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:29604-DB
MFA No. 6069 of 2022
AND:
1. SMT. SARALA @ BASAMMA N.L.
W/O G R RAVI KUMAR,
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
OCC: HOUSEHOLD.
2. N S LAVAKUMAR,
S/O SHARANAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURIST.
3. SINDHU N L
D/O N S LAVAKUMAR,
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,
OCC: STUDENT
4. SANDHYA N L
D/O: N S LAVAKUMAR,
AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,
OCC: STUDENT
RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 4 ARE
RESIDING AT: R/O: NEERTHADI VILLAGE,
DAVANAGERE TALUK AND DISTRICT.
5. SHEKHARAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS,
OCC: RETIRED TEACHER / AGRICULTURIST,
R/O NEAR BUS STAND BASAPURA,
(HUCHCHAVVANAHALLI BASAPURA),
MAYAKONDA HOBLI,
DAVANAGERE TALUK AND DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENTS
THIS MFA IS FILED AND PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED: 07.10.2021 PASSED BY
JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT DAVANAGERE, IN O.S.NO.36/2015
ETC.
-3-
NC: 2023:KHC:29604-DB
MFA No. 6069 of 2022
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
G.NARENDAR J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Matter is called.
2. There is no representation.
3. The office note states that the appeal is
listed for the fourth time in view of non-compliance of
the office objections raised by the Registry. The
appeal is of the year 2021. The objections are that;
court fee is not paid, the second set of the appeal is
not filed and so forth.
4. It clearly demonstrates a lack of interest on
the part of the appellant. We are unable to condone
the absence of the counsel also.
5. In that view, the appeal does not deserve
for further consideration at the hands of this Court.
NC: 2023:KHC:29604-DB MFA No. 6069 of 2022
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
CHS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!