Ln Annoji Rao vs M Seenoji Rao
2023 Latest Caselaw 5690 Kant

                                                  -1-
                                                          NC: 2023:KHC:29463
                                                         RSA No. 116 of 2007




                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                           DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2023

                                             BEFORE
                           THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
                           REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 116 OF 2007
                      BETWEEN:

                      L.N. ANNOJI RAO
                      SINCE DEAD BY HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES

                      1.   SMT. ASHA
                           W/O L.A. SOMASHEKAR
                           D/O LATE ANNOJI RAO.

                      2.   MANJU
                           S/O LATE. L.A. SOMASHEKAR
                           AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS.

                      3.   SRI SANJU
                           S/O LATE L.A. SOMASHEKAR
                           AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS.
Digitally signed by
SUNITHA                    APPELLANT 1 TO 3 ARE
GANGARAJU
Location: High
                           R/O AT 8TH CROSS
Court of Karnataka         SOPPUGADDE, THEERTHAHALLI
                           SHIMOGA DISTRICT.

                      4.   SMT. L.A. SHARAVATHI BAI
                           W/O M.T. RAJA RAO
                           D/O LATE ANNOJI RAO
                           AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
                           R/O NEW JANATHA COLONY
                           MALAGALA 9TH BLOCK
                           NAGARABAVI 2ND STAGE
                           BANGALORE.
                           -2-
                                         NC: 2023:KHC:29463
                                    RSA No. 116 of 2007




5.   SMT. L.A. LALITABAI
     D/O LATE AANOJI RAO
     W/O N. JAGANATHA RAO
     AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
     R/O B.H. ROAD, TARIKERE
     CHIKMAGALORE DISTRICT.

6.   SMT. L.A. PUSHPA
     D/O LATE ANNOJI RAO
     W/O BABU RAO
     AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS.
     R/O HONDADA CIRCLE, KODAJI ROAD
     VENKATESHWARA COLONY
     DAVANAGERE.

7.   SMT. LATA
     W/O LATE MAILARI RAO
     S/O LATE ANNOJI RAO
     RESIDING AT OLD TOWN
     2ND CROSS, BHDRAVATHI - 577 301
     SHIMOGA DISTRICT.

8.   SRI. A. RAJASHEKAR
     S/O LATE ANNOJI RAO
     AGED ABOUT 40 EYARS.
     R/AT C/O NAVARATHNA WINCE CENTRE
     T.M. ROAD, RANGENAHALLI, TARIKERE TALUK
     CHIKMAGALORE DIST.
                                              ...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. G S BALAGANGADHAR .,ADVOCATE)
AND:
M SEENOJI RAO
S/O MANJOJI RAO
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
AGRICULTURIST
R/O TM ROAD,
LAKKAVALLI, TARIKERE TALUK
CHICKAMAGALORE DIST 577101
                                             ...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. K N DAYALU ASSTS .,ADVOCATES)
                                -3-
                                            NC: 2023:KHC:29463
                                          RSA No. 116 of 2007




      THIS R.S.A IS FILED U/S.100 OF CPC AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT     AND      DECREE     DT.27.9.2006       PASSED   IN
R.A.NO.40/2000 ON THE FILE OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER,
FTC, TARIKERE, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE
THE   JUDGMENT       AND   DECREE    DT.13.6.2000   PASSED   IN
O.S.NO.150/96 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AND
ADDL. JMFC, TARIKERE.

      THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:


                           JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the appellants seeks time and

submits that the learned counsel has already issued notice

to the appellants.

2. Inspite of service of notice, the appellants have

not turned up. Already, sufficient time has been granted to

the appellants to address his arguments. Inspite of

granting sufficient opportunity, the appellants failed to

address their arguments.

NC: 2023:KHC:29463 RSA No. 116 of 2007

3. The matter is of the year 2007. It shows that

the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the

appeal.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-

prosecution.

Sd/-

JUDGE

SSB