Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5443 Kant
Judgement Date : 9 August, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC-D:8608-DB
RFA No. 100258 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.100258/2020 (PAR/POS)
BETWEEN:
SHRI. GURU @ GURURAJ
S/O. RACHAPPA BIJAPUR,
AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
R/O: DESHAPANDE NAGAR,
HUBBALLI, PIN-580020,
TQ: HUBBALLI, DIST: DHARWAD.
...APPELLANT
Digitally
signed by
SAMREEN
AYUB
(BY SRI. MRUTYUNJAY TATA BANGI, ADVOCATE)
DESHNUR
SAMREEN Location: High
AYUB Court of
DESHNUR Karnataka,
Dharwad
Date:
2023.08.14
10:55:23
AND:
+0530
1. SMT. NALINI W/O. SURESH AMBALI
AGED ABOUT: 64 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
R/O: VIJAYAPURA, TQ & DIST: VIJAYAPURA.
2. SHRI. ISHANNA S/O. RACHAPPA BIJAPUR,
AGED ABOUT: 63 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
R/O: DESHPANDE NAGAR,
HUBBALLI, PIN-580020,
TQ: HUBBALLI, DIST: DHARWAD.
3. SHRI. MALLIKARJUN S/O. RACHAPPA BIJAPUR,
AGED ABOUT: 60 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
R/O: DESHPANDE NAGAR,
HUBBALLI, PIN-580020,
TQ: HUBBALLI, DIST: DHARWAD.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PRAKASH A. ANDANIMATH, ADV. FOR R2,
SMT. ARCHANA A. MAGADUM, ADV. FOR 3, R1 - SERVED)
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC-D:8608-DB
RFA No. 100258 of 2020
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC. 96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DTD.31.08.2016 PASSED IN O.S.NO.173/
2015 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,
HUBBALLI, DECREEING THE SUIT FILED FOR PARTITION AND
SEPARATE POSSESSION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR J., PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Shri. A.S. Patil, learned counsel has filed memo seeking
permission to retire from the case. Since Shri. Mrutyunjay Tata
Bangi has filed vakalth for the appellant, Shri. A.S. Patil is
permitted to retire. His name be deleted from the cause list.
2. Heard on I.A.No.1/2022. There is a delay of 1302
days in filing the appeal. We do not find any sufficient reason
for the delay in filing the appeal. It is also submitted by Shri.
Mrutyunjay Tata Bangi, learned counsel that share allotted to
the appellant/defendant no.2 is proper and correct.
3. In view of his submission, I.A.No.1/2022 does not
survive and it is dismissed. Consequently, the appeal is also
dismissed. No order as to costs.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!