Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri S Nandakumar vs Dr A Savitha @ Soumya
2022 Latest Caselaw 12550 Kant

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12550 Kant
Judgement Date : 18 October, 2022

Karnataka High Court
Sri S Nandakumar vs Dr A Savitha @ Soumya on 18 October, 2022
Bench: Alok Aradhe, S Vishwajith Shetty
                              1



 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

       DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2022

                           PRESENT

        THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE

                            AND

  THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. VISHWAJITH SHETTY

             M.F.A. NO.8526 OF 2014 (FC)
                         C/W
             M.F.A. NO.8531 OF 2014 (FC)

IN M.F.A. NO.8526 OF 2014

BETWEEN:

SRI. S. NANDAKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
S/O SRI. SUBRAMANYA REDDY
RESIDING AT NO.139, 2ND MAIN
SRINIVASA ROAD, 2ND BLOCK
THYAGARAJANAGAR, BANGALORE-560028.
                                      ... APPELLANT
(BY MR. NAIK N.R. ADV.,)

AND:

DR. A. SAVITHA @ SOUMYA
W/O SRI. S. NANDAKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.331
9TH CROSS, SHASTRINAGAR
BANGALORE-560028.
                                    ... RESPONDENT
(BY MR. A. MAHESH CHOWDHARY, ADV., FOR
    MR. A. NAGARAJA NAIDU, ADV.,)
                         ---
                             2




     THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 19(1) OF FAMILY COURTS ACT,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:25.08.2014
PASSED ON MC NO.1497/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE
PRINCIPAL   JUDGE,     FAMILY    COURT,    BANGALORE,
DISMISSING THE PETITION FILED U/S 9 OF HINDU
MARRIAGE ACT, FOR RESTITUTION OF CONJUGAL RIGHTS
AND ALLOWING THE COUNTER CLAIM FOR RESPONDENT
THEREIN FILED U/S 12(1)(a) & SECTION 13(!)(ia) OF THE
HINDU MARRIAGE ACT.

IN M.F.A. NO.8531 OF 2014

BETWEEN:

SRI. S. NANDAKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
S/O SRI. SUBRAMANYA REDDY
RESIDING AT NO.139, 2ND MAIN
SRINIVASA ROAD, 2ND BLOCK
THYAGARAJANAGAR, BANGALORE-560028.
                                       ... APPELLANT
(BY MR. NAIK N.R. ADV.,)

AND:

DR. A. SAVITHA @ SOUMYA
W/O SRI. S. NANDAKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.331
9TH CROSS, SHASTRINAGAR
BANGALORE-560028.
                                    ... RESPONDENT
(BY MR. A. MAHESH CHOWDHARY, ADV., FOR
    MR. A. NAGARAJA NAIDU, ADV.,)
                         ---

     THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 19(1) OF FAMILY COURTS ACT
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:25.8.2014
PASSED IN M.C.NO.1497/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE
PRINCIPAL   JUDGE,    FAMILY     COURT,    BANGALORE,
                            3



DISMISSING THE PETITION FILED U/SEC 9 OF THE HINDU
MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 FOR RESTITUTION OF CONJUGAL
RIGHTS.       AND ALLOWING THE COUNTER CLAIM FOR
RESPONDENT THEREIN FILED U/S 12(1)(a) AND SECTION
13(i)(ia) OF HINDU MARRIAGE ACT.

     THESE M.F.As. COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

                        JUDGMENT

MFA No.8526/2014 has been filed against

judgment and decree dated 25.08.2014 passed in

M.C.No.1497/2012 by the Family Court by which

marriage between the parties has been dissolved.

MFA No.8531/2014 has been filed against

judgment and decree dated 25.08.2014 passed in

M.C.No.1497/2012 by the Family Court by which the

petition filed by the appellant under Section 9 of the

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as

'the Act' for short) has been dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits

that the respondent has re-married and has a child

from the second marriage. It is further submitted that

the respondent does not intend to press the ground of

dissolution of marriage under Section 12(1)(a) of the

Act and the decree for dissolution of marriage may be

affirmed on the ground mentioned under Section

13(1)(ia) of the Act.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted

that the appellant has no objection to the aforesaid

prayer.

4. In view of the aforesaid submissions and in

view of the subsequent events which have taken place

during the pendency of these appeals, judgment and

decree dated 25.08.2014 passed in

M.C.No.1497/2012 insofar as it pertains to

dissolution of marriage between the parties on the

ground enumerated under Section 12(1)(a) of the Act

is hereby set aside. However, dissolution of marriage

has been confirmed on the ground mentioned under

Section 13(1)(ia) of the Act.

Accordingly, MFA No.8526/2014 is disposed of.

5. In view of confirmation of judgment and

decree for dissolution of marriage in MFA

No.8526/2014, MFA No.8531/2014 is hereby

dismissed.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

JUDGE

RV

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter