Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12512 Kant
Judgement Date : 17 October, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5762 OF 2021
BETWEEN
1 . SMT SHWETHA RAO D
D/O D SHEKAR RAO,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
2 . SRI SHASHANK D RAO
S/O D SHEKAR RAO,
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,
3 . SRI SHEKAR RAO D
S/O KRISHNA RAO,
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
ALL ARE R/AT NO.45, SFS 407,
YELAHANKA NEW TOWN,
BENGALURU-560064
... PETITIONERS
(BY SRI RAMACHANDRA M B, ADVOCATE)
AND
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY YELAHANKA NEW TOWN POLICE STATION,
REPRESENTED BY LEARNED STATE PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560001
2
2. SRI GIRISH GANGANAGAIAH
S/O G V GANGANAGAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
R/AT NO.136, 10TH CROSS,
2ND BLOCK, R TNAGAR,
BENGALURU-560032
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI R.D. RENUKARADHYA, HCGP FOR R1
SMT G.K. BHAVANA, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION
482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR ISSUED IN
CR.NO.102/2021 OF RESPONDENT NO.1 POLICE FOR THE
OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS
506,341,504,323 READ WITH SECTION 34 OF IPC
AGAINST THE PETITIONERS AND THE SAME IS PENDING
FOR INVESTIGATION ON THE FILE OF XXX ADDL.C.M.M.,
BENGALURU.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR
ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE
FOLLOWING:
ORDER
This petition is filed by the petitioners-accused Nos.1
to 3 under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing the FIR in
Crime No.102/2021 registered by Yelahanka New Town
Police Station, Bengaluru for the offences punishable under
Sections 506, 341, 504, 323 read with Section 34 of IPC.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners
and learned High Court Government Pleader for
respondent No.1-State and learned counsel for the
respondent No.2.
3. The learned counsel for the respondent filed a
memo along with the judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench
in W.P.No.16070/2021 c/w W.P.No.16076/2021 dated
05.09.2022. There was a settlement between the
petitioners and the defacto-complainant in all M.C.
matters, GMWC matters and other cases and therefore,
the defacto-complainant has no objection to quash the FIR
against the petitioners.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners also
submits that the matter has been settled between the
parties and even the Police have said to be filed B-Final
report before the Magistrate and the Magistrate has not
yet accepted the B-Final report and no notice has been
issued by the Magistrate to the defacto-complainant.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the
matter has already been settled between the parties and
has no objection to quash the FIR.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the
case, once petitioner No.1 is said to be the wife and the
defacto-complainant is said to be husband and there was
matrimonial dispute between the parties and all the
matters are said to be settled before the Co-ordinate
Bench and in view of the settlement before the Co-ordinate
Bench and by filing B-Final report by the Police before the
Magistrate, therefore, continuing the criminal proceedings
or continuing the investigation against the petitioners is
abuse of process of law. Therefore, the FIR against the
petitioners is liable to be quashed.
6. Accordingly, the petition is allowed.
The FIR in Crime No.102/2021 against the
petitioners-accused Nos.1 to 3 registered by the Yelahanka
New Town Police Station, Bengaluru for the offences
punishable under Sections 506, 341, 504, 323 read with
Section 34 of IPC is hereby quashed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
GBB
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!