Smt Annapoornabai W/O ... vs Arjunsa S/O Chintamansa ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 12466 Kant

                            1




     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
        DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022
                         BEFORE
         THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
     REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.866 OF 2006 (DEC/PAR)


BETWEEN:

1.      SMT.ANNAPOORNABAI
        W/O SHANMUKHASA BEVINAKATTI,
        AGED:MAJOR
        OCC:HOUSEHOLD,
        R/O GADAG, TQ:GADAG.

2.      SHANKARASA
        S/O SHANMUKHASA BEVINAKATTI,
        AGED:MAJOR
        OCC:BUSINESS,
        R/O GADAG, TQ:GADAG.

3.      CHITAMANSA
        S/O SHANMUKHASA BEVINAKATTI,
        AGED:MAJOR
        OCC:BUSINESS,
        R/O GADAG, TQ:GADAG.

4.      SAROJA,
        W/O MOTILALSA CHOWDARY,
        AGED:MAJOR
        OCC:HOUSEHOLD WORK,
        R/O   , TQ:GADAG.

5.      SMT.NEELAWWA,
        W/O SHANMUKHASA BEVINAKATTI,
        AGED:MAJOR
        OCC:HOUSEHOLD,
        R/O GADAG, TQ:GADAG.

6.      SMT.SAVITHA,
        W/O DHONDUSA CHAVADIMANI,
                               2




       AGED:MAJOR
       OCC:HOUSEHOLD,
       R/O GADAG, TQ:GADAG.

7.     SMT.GEETHA,
       W/O NARASINGSA KABADI,
       AGED:MAJOR
       OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
       R/O GADAG, TQ:GADAG.

8.     SMT.ANITHA,
       D/O SHANMUKHASA BEVINAKATTI,
       AGED:MAJOR
       OCC:HOUSEHOLD WORK,
       R/O GADAG, TQ:GADAG.

9.     SMT.SARASWATHIBAI,
       W/O SURENDRASA PAWAR,
       SINCE DECEASED BY HER LRs.

9-A.   SRI SURENDRASA RAMKRISHNA PAWAR,
       AGE:80 YEARS, OCC:NIL,
       R/O SADALIGE BUILDING,
       VIJAYA MAHANTESH NAGAR,
       MAIGUR ROAD, JAMAKHANDI.

9-B.   SRI SRIDHAR SURENDRASA PAWAR,
       AGED 52 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESS,
       R/O KUDACHE MALA OPPOSITE RADHA MOHAN
       PROCES, ICHALAKARANJI,
       MAHARASTRA STATE.

9-C.   SRI MOHAN SURENDRASA PAWAR,
       AGE:48 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESS,
       R/O SADALIGE BUILDING,
       VIJAYA MAHANTESH NAGAR,
       MAIGUR ROAD, JAMAKHANDI.

9-D.   SRI RAMKRISHNASA SURENDRASA PAWAR,
       AGE:43 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESS,
       R/O SADALIGE BLUILDING,
       VIJAYA MAHANTESH NAGAR,
       MAIGUR ROAD, JAMAKHANDI.
                             3




9-E.   SRI MAHESH SURENDRASA PAWAR,
       AGE:40 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESS,
       R/O SADALIGE BUILDING,
       VIJAYA MAHANTESH NAGAR,
       MAIGUR ROAD, JAMAKHANDI.

9-F.   SMT.CHANDRALEKHA
       W/O ARJUNSA HABIB,
       AGE:53 YEARS, OCC:HOUSEHOLD,
       BANKERS COLONY, NEAR PANCHA MARUTI
       TEMPLE, GADAG.

9-G.   SMT.ROOPA
       W/O MANJUNATHSA HABIB,
       AGE:46 YEARS, OCC:HOUSEHOLD WORK,
       R/O NEAR REDDY CO-OPERATIVE BANK,
       BAKALE CORSS, AZAD NAGAR,
       HUBLI.

9-H.   SMT.VASANTI SURENDRASA PAWAR,
       AGE:50 YEARS, OCC:HOUSEHOLD,
       BANKERS COLONY, NEAR PANCHA MARUTI
       TEMPLE, GADAG.

10.    AMBUBAI
       W/O BALACHANDRASA TIKALE,
       AGE: 62 YEARS,
       OCC:HOUSEHOLD,
       R/O GADAG, TQ:GADAG.                 ...APPELLANTS

[BY SRI R.K.KULKARNI, ADVOCATE FOR A-2 TO A-9 (ABSENT);
    SRI M.RAM BHAT & SHREEPADA & PRANATI S.BHAT,
    ADVCOATE (ABSENT)]

AND:

1.     ARJUNSA,
       S/O CHINTAMANSA BEVINAKATTI,
       AGE:62 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESS,
       R/O JAVALGALLI, GADAG,
       TQ: GADAG.
                             4




2.   SUMITHA
     W/O NAGOSA KHATWATE,
     AGE: MAJOR,
     OCC: HOUSE HOLD WORK,
     R/O KAGADAGERI, TQ. GADAG.

3.   LAXMIBAI
     W/O CHANDRAKANTHSA KALABURGI,
     AGE:MAJOR, OCC:HOUSEHOLD WORK,
     R/O NO.1114, RAMALINGESHWARA NAGAR,
     NEAR CHURCH, GOKUL ROAD,
     HUBLI.

4.   SMT.SUREKHA DEVENDRASA VALVEKAR,
     AGE: MAJOR,
     OCC:HOUSEHODL,
     R/O NO.807, GANGAPET,
     (MAHATMA PULE PET),
     KASTURI CHOUK, PUNE.             ... RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI K.L.PATIL & S.BETUR MATH, ADVOCATES FOR R1;
    SRI K.L.PATIL, S.S.BETURMATH, B.G.INDI, S.A.SANDUR
      & P.S.TADAPATRI, ADVOCATES FOR R1(a) PROP.,;
      SRI H.N.GULARADDI, ADVOCATE FOR PROP.R1(B,C & E)


     THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION
100 OF CPC, CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
24.12.2005   PASSED   BY   THE   COURT   OF   ADDL.   CIVIL
JUDGE(JR.DN.), GADAGIN R.A.NO.04/1999, CONFIRMING THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 07.11.1998 PASSED BY THE II
ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.), GADAG, IN O.S.NO.464/1989.


     THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL POSTED FOR ORDERS,
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                              5




                          ORDER

Though matter called twice, there is no representation

on behalf of appellants. Hence, the Regular Second Appeal

is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/-

JUDGE TKN