Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4778 Kant
Judgement Date : 15 March, 2022
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF MARCH, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. RITU RAJ AWASTHI, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO.24356 OF 2021 (GM-MMS)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI G.C.SHEKAR
S/O SRI G.CHANDRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
R/AT SIDDARAMESHWARA CIRCLE
BRUJANAHATTI
CHITRADURGA TOWN
CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 501
2. SMT. SHARADAMMA STONE CRUSHERS
OFFICE AT: SIDDARAMESHWARA CIRCLE
BRUJANAHATTI
CHITRADURGA TOWN
CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 501
REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR
SMT. SHARADAMMA
... PETITIONERS
(BY SRI BHAT GANAPATHY NARAYAN, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF SECRETARY
VIDHANA SOUDHA
DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VIDHI
BENGALURU - 560 001
2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY
VIDHANA SOUDHA
DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VIDHI
BENGALURU - 560 001
-2-
3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF FOREST
VIDHANA SOUDHA
DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VIDHI
BENGALURU - 560 001
4. THE LICENSING AUTHORITY/PRESIDENT
AND DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
DISTRICT STONE CRUSHER LICENSING
AND CONTROLLING AUTHORITY
CHITRADURGA - 577 501
5. THE DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY
KANIJA BHAVAN
BENGALURU - 560 001
6. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY
CHITRADURGA TALUK
CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 501
7. THE DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FOREST
CHITRADURGA TALUK
CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 501
8. THE RANGE OFFICER
WILDLIFE RANGE
CHITRADURGA - 577 501
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI S.S.MAHENDRA, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)
---
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A
WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY APPROPRIATE ORDER QUASHING
THE IMPUGNED NOTICE OF SUSPENSION ORDER DATED
TH
30.07.2019 ISSUED BY THE 6 RESPONDENT, AS PER
ANNEXURE-H, IN RESPECT OF SCHEDULE QUARRY LEASE AND
CRUSHER UNIT AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
THIS DAY, CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
ORDER
Heard.
2. The writ petition has been filed seeking the following
reliefs:
"i) Issue Writ of Certiorari or any appropriate order quashing the impugned Notice of Suspension Order dated 30.07.2019 bearing Sl.No.GA.BHU. EI/UI.NI.CHI/ KA.GA.GHU/ - 577/ ECO/ 2019-20/3645, issued by the 6th respondent, as per Annexure-H, in respect of schedule quarry lease and crusher unit, in the interest of justice and equity.
ii) Issue Writ of Mandamus or any
appropriate direction to the 6th
respondent to permit the quarry
operations in the schedule property, in the interest of justice and equity.
iii) Grand such other relief's as this Hon'ble Court deems fit to grant on the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
impugned order dated 30.07.2019 has been passed by the
Deputy Director, Department of Mines and Geology,
Chitradurga stopping the mining activities of the petitioners'
mining lease. It is submitted that under the similar facts
and circumstances in Writ Petition No.9166/2021 (GM-
MMS) (STAR STONE CRUSHER vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
AND OTHERS) the Court, vide judgment and order dated
31.05.2021, has held that the Deputy Director of Mines and
Geology Department has no power to suspend the
operations under a subsisting quarrying lease and the
crushing activities under the subsisting licence under
Section 3 of the Karnataka Regulation of Stone Crushers
Act, 2011. The Court has given liberty to the respondents
to initiate proceedings for cancellation of lease or license,
as the case may be, in accordance with law.
4. The order dated 31.05.2021, for convenience is
reproduced below:
"Issue notice. The learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents.
2. This petition will be governed by the judgment and order delivered today (31st May 2021) in W.P.No.9158/2021. For the reasons recorded in the said judgment and order, we pass the following order:
(a) The impugned order/notice at Annexure-L dated 30th July 2019 is hereby quashed and set aside only on the ground that in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Deputy Director of the Mines and Geology Department had no power to suspend the operations under a subsisting quarrying lease and the crushing activities under a subsisting licence under Section 3 of the said Act of 2011;
(b) However, this judgment and order will not preclude the concerned respondents from initiating proceedings for cancellation of the lease or licence, as the case may be, in accordance with law;
(c) We make it clear that we have made no adjudication on the factual assertions made in the impugned order/notice. All the issues are kept open to be decided in the appropriate proceedings;
(d) Accordingly, the petition is disposed of on the above terms;
(e) The pending interlocutory application does not survive and is accordingly disposed of."
5. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing
for the respondents does not dispute the aforesaid position.
6. In view of the above, we are of the considered view
that the order impugned is not sustainable in the eyes of
law as it is not been passed by the competent authority. It
is accordingly quashed. However, it is open for the
competent authority to pass a fresh order in accordance
with law. The respondents may initiate proceedings for
cancellation of lease or licence, as the case may be, in
accordance with law. We make it clear that we have made
no adjudication on the factual assertions made in the
impugned order. All the issues are to be decided in the
appropriate proceedings.
7. With the consent of the parties' counsel, the writ
petition stands allowed.
Sd/-
CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
JUDGE
AHB
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!