Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mr Ashfaq Ahmed vs Mrs Iqbalunnisa Begum
2022 Latest Caselaw 3875 Kant

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3875 Kant
Judgement Date : 7 March, 2022

Karnataka High Court
Mr Ashfaq Ahmed vs Mrs Iqbalunnisa Begum on 7 March, 2022
Bench: Sreenivas Harish Kumar
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

     DATED THIS THE 07 T H DAY OF MARCH, 2022

                        BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR

           MFA NO.2503 OF 2015 (CPC)


BETWEEN:


1.   Mr. Ashfaq Ahmed,
     Son of Late M.Khad er Hussain,
     Aged about 55 years,
     Residing at No.9950, SW 8 t h St,
     Pemb roke Pines, Flordia - 33025.

2.   Mr. Mustaq Ahmed,
     Son of Late M.Khad er Hussain,
     Aged about 61 years,
     Residing at No.19310, SW 14 t h St,
     Pemb roke Pines, Flordia - 33029.

3.   Mr. Mohammed Irfan,
     Son of Late M.Khad er Hussain,
     Aged about 51 years,
     Residing at No.6989, Julia Gard en,
     Dr. Coconut Creek, Florida-33073.
     USA.

4.   Mrs. Shaheen Farzana,
     Daug hter of Late M.Khader Hussain,
     Aged about 52 years,
     Residing at No.341, NE 164 t h St,
     N.Milami Beach, Florid a-33162.
     USA.

5.   Mrs. Sarwath Begum,
     Daug hter of Late M.Khader Hussain,
                            :: 2 ::


     Aged about 49 years,
     Residing at No.9662, Kilgore Road,
     Orlando, Florid a-32836.

6.   Mrs. Aneed Fathima,
     Daug hter of Late M.Khader Hussain,
     Aged about 47 years,
     Residing at No.848, Horse Shoe Falls,
     Orlando, Florid a-32836.
     USA.

     All are duly represented
     By their GPA Holder,

     Mr. S.P.S.Khad ri,
     Son of S.R.S.Khadri,
     Aged about 38 years,
     Residing at No.62,
     1 s t Main, 1 s t Cross,
     K.H.R. Colony,
     Beng aluru-560018.
                                             ...Appellants
(By Smt. Sunitha H Singh, Advocate)


AND:


1.   Mrs. Iqb alunnisa Begum,
     Wife of Late M.Khad er Hussain,
     Aged about 82 years,

2.   Mrs. Khurathulain Rokya Banu,
     Daug hter Late M.Khader Hussain,
     Aged about 66 years,

     Both are residing at No.15073,
     Water ford chase,
     Parkway Orlando,
     Florid a-32828, USA.
                                          ...Respondents

(By Sri M.D.Rag hunath, Advocate for R1 and R2)
                                  :: 3 ::



      This MFA is filed under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of
CPC, ag ainst the order d ated 05.03.2015, passed on
I.A.No.I in O.S.No.1056/2014, on the file of the V
Additional    City   Civil   &    Sessions     Judge,   Beng aluru,
rejecting IA No.1 filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2
read with Section 151 of CPC.


      This MFA coming on for admission this d ay, the
Court delivered the following:


                         JUDGMENT

Heard Smt. Sunitha H Singh, learned counsel

for the appellants and Sri M.D.Raghunath, learned

counsel for respondents 1 and 2.

2. This appeal is filed by the plaintiffs in

O.S.No.1056/2014 on the file of the V Additional

City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, as the

trial Court refused to grant an order of temporary

injunction restraining the defendants from

alienating the suit property bearing BBMP No.180

2nd Cross, Vivek Nagar (formerly known as

Sonnenahalli) Civil Station, Bengaluru. The :: 4 ::

plaintiffs are the children of one M.Khader

Hussain, now deceased and defendant No.1, Mrs.

Iqbalunnissa Begum.

3. The suit property was earlier allotted to

M.Khader Hussain by the CITB, by executing a

lease cum sale agreement in the year 1965.

M.Khader Hussain died in the year 1979 and in the

year 1986, CITB executed sale deed in favour of

the first defendant. It appears that the first

defendant executed settlement deed in favour of

second defendant and this is the reason for all the

plaintiffs to approach the civil Court for partition.

4. The question is actually with regard to

right to claim partition in the property which was

allotted to the first defendant as the owner,

though lease cum sale agreement was made in

favour of M.Khader Hussain.

5. Since the suit is of the year 2014, it is

better that the suit is disposed of at the earliest, :: 5 ::

both the parties to the suit are hereby directed to

maintain status-quo with regard to alienation of

the suit property till disposal of the suit.

The appeal stands disposed of accordingly.

All contentions are kept open.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Kmv/-

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter