Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ashok Shivalingappa Gabbur vs Preeti W/O Kalabasappa Kapali
2022 Latest Caselaw 3612 Kant

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3612 Kant
Judgement Date : 3 March, 2022

Karnataka High Court
Ashok Shivalingappa Gabbur vs Preeti W/O Kalabasappa Kapali on 3 March, 2022
Bench: N.S.Sanjay Gowda
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
                 DHARWAD BENCH

     DATED THIS THE 03 R D DAY OF MARCH, 2022
                           BEFORE
 THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA

               MFA No.100473 OF 2022 (CPC)
BETWEEN:

ASHOK SHIVALINGAPPA GABBUR
AGE: 59 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE
AND BUSINESS,
R/O: RAILWAY STATION ROAD,
BAGALAKOTE-587101.
TQ. AND DIST: BAGALAKOTE.
                                                 ... PETITIONER
(BY SRI. AVINASH S. MALIPATIL, ADV.)

AND:
1.     PREETI W/O. KALABASAPPA KAPALI
       AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
       R/O: KIRASUR-587115,
       TQ. AND DIST: BAGALKOTE.

2.     SMT. RATNAVVA W/O. ASHOK GABBUR
       AGE: 57 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
       R/O: RAILWAY STATION ROAD,
       BAGALAKOTE-587101.
       TQ. AND DIST: BAGALAKOTE.

3.     SMT. ANITA W/O. MALLIKARJUN @ KUMAR
       ULLAGADDI,
       AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
       R/O: BASAVAN BAGEWADI-586203,
       TQ. BASAVAN BAGEWADI, DIST: VIJAYAPURA.
                             :2:



4.    MAHANTESHWARI W/O. RAMESH GABBUR
      AGE: 59 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
      R/O: RAILWAY STATION ROAD,
      BAGALAKOTE-587101.
      TQ. AND DIST: BAGALAKOTE.

5.    SHRISHAIL S/O. RAMESH GABBUR
      AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE
      AND BUSINESS,
      R/O: RAILWAY STATION ROAD,
      BAGALAKOTE-587101.
      TQ. AND DIST: BAGALAKOTE.

6.    JYOTI W/O. BASAVARAJ NIDONI
      AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
      R/O: RAILWAY STATION ROAD,
      BAGALAKOTE-587101.
      TQ. AND DIST: BAGALAKOTE.

7.    ANIL S/O. RAMESH GABBUR
      AGE: 37 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE
      AND BUSINESS,
      R/O: RAILWAY STATION ROAD,
      BAGALAKOTE-587101.
      TQ. AND DIST: BAGALAKOTE.

8.    GURURAJ S/O. RAMESH GABBUR
      AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,
      R/O: RAILWAY STATION ROAD,
      BAGALAKOTE-587101.
      TQ. AND DIST: BAGALAKOTE.

9.    SHIVANAND S/O. SHIVALINGAPPA GABBUR
      AGE: 59 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE
      AND BUSINESS,
      R/O: RAILWAY STATION ROAD,
      BAGALAKOTE-587101.
      TQ. AND DIST: BAGALAKOTE.

10.   JAYASHREE W/O. DUNDESH PUJARI
      AGE: 57 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE
      AND BUSINESS,
      R/O: RAILWAY STATION ROAD,
      BAGALAKOTE-587101.
      TQ. AND DIST: BAGALAKOTE.

11.   MANJULA W/O. SHIVANAND GABBUR
      AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
                                 :3:



       R/O: RAILWAY STATION ROAD,
       BAGALAKOTE-587101.
       TQ. AND DIST: BAGALAKOTE.

12.    SUJATA W/O. SHARANU ANANDAPPANAVAR
       AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
       R/O: RAILWAY STATION ROAD,
       BAGALAKOTE-587101.
       TQ. AND DIST: BAGALAKOTE.

13.    VINOD S/O. SHRISAIL ULLAGADDI
       AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: PVT. JOB,
       R/O: NIDAGUNDI - 586213,
       TQ: MUDDEBIHAL, DIST: VIJAYAPURA.
                                                     ... RESPONDENTS

      THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLIII RULE 1(r) OF THE
CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED
13.01.2022, PASSED IN O.S. NO.37/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, AND CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
AT BAGALKOT, PARTLY ALLOWING THE IA NO.5 FILED UNDER ORDER
39 RULE 1 AND 2 OF CPC.

     THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT
MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                            JUDGMENT

An order was passed on I.A. No.5 in O.S.No.37/2017

restraining the defendant No.1, 4A to 6 from alienating,

transferring and mortgaging the suit 'B' schedule item No. 2 to 7

and suit 'C' schedule item no. 1 and 2 was challenged in M.F.A.

No.100471/2022. The said appeal was dismissed.

2. In this appeal a similar order has been passed on I.A

No.8 in the very same suit i.e. O.S.No.37/2017 against

defendant No. 1, 4(A) to (E), 5 and 6 restraining them from

alienating, transferring, mortgaging the suit schedule 'B' item

No.8 and suit schedule 'C' item No.30 properties.

3. Since a similar order in respect of other items has

already been confirmed in MFA No.100471/2022, this appeal is

also dismissed.

4. It is hereby made clear that any observation made in

this order shall not be construed as rendering opinion on the

merits of the case.

Sd/-

JUDGE

SMM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter