Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8215 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 June, 2022
-1-
RSA No. 100279 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 06TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 100279 OF 2015 (DEC/INJ-)
BETWEEN:
1. SMT.JANABAI W/O SHANTARAM SALUNKE,
AGE:62 YEARS, OCC:HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O: BHARPETH GALLI,
NEAR MAKKA MASJID,
JAMAKHANDI-587 310,
DIST: BAGALKOT.
2. SRI PARASHURAM S/O SHANTARAM SALUNKE,
AGE:47 YEARS, OCC:SERVICE,
R/O:BHARPETH GALLI,
NEAR MAKKA MASJID,
JAMAKHANDI-587, 310,
DIST: BAGALKOT.
3. SRI.MARUTI S/O SHANTARAM SALUNKE,
AGE:41 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESS,
SHIVAKUMAR
HIREMATH
R/O:BHARPETH GALLI,
NEAR MAKKA MASJID,
Digitally signed
by SHIVAKUMAR
HIREMATH JAMAKHANDI-587310,
Date: 2022.06.10
11:47:49 -0700
DIST: BAGALKOT.
4. KUM. MAHADEVI D/O SHANTARAM SALUNKE,
AGE:35 YEARS, OCC:HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O:BHARPETH GALLI,
NEAR MAKKA MASJID,
JAMAKHANDI-587310,
DIST: BAGALKOT.
-2-
RSA No. 100279 of 2015
5. KUM. GIRIJA D/O SHANTARAM SALUNKE,
AGE:31 YEARS, OCC:HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O:BHARPETH GALLI,
NEAR MAKKA MASJID,
JAMAKHANDI-587310,
DIST: BAGALKOT.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. PRASHANT S. KADADEVAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. MUSA S/O BABALAL SHEIKH,
AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: PIGMY COLLECTOR,
R/O: BHARPETH GALLI,
NEAR MAKKA MASJID,
JAMAKHANDI- 587 310,
DST: BAGALKOT.
2. FIROZ S/O BABALAL SHEIKH,
AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESS,
R/O: BHARPETH GALLI,
NEAR MAKKA MASJID,
JAMAKHANDI-587 310,
DIST: BAGALKOT.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MRUTYUNJAY TATA BANGI, ADVOCATE)
THIS RSA IS FILED U/S.100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE
JUDGEMENT & DECREE DTD:20.08.2014 PASSED IN
R.A.NO.63/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE, JAMAKHANDI, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND
CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DTD:17.07.2009
AND THE DECREE PASSED IN O.S. NO.28/2006 ON THE FILE
OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) JAMKHANDI,
PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FILED FOR DECLARATION,
MANDATORY INJUNCTION AND CONSEQUENTIAL RELIEF OF
PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
RSA No. 100279 of 2015
ORDER
No representation on behalf of the appellants
This appeal was listed before the Court on 02.06.2022 and
on that day, learned counsel appearing for the appellants submitted
that he was not ready to address his arguments and thereafter the
case was adjourned to today.
The case was called in the morning session. No
representation on behalf of the appellants. On the other hand,
Ms.Deepa J., learned counsel, appeared on behalf of the
respondents.
Again the case is called at 4.00 pm and there is no
representation on behalf of the appellants and learned counsel
appearing for the respondents is present.
This would establish the fact that the appellants are not
interested in prosecuting the matter. Accordingly, the appeal is
dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE gab
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!