Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mallamma W/O Late Ramesh Mashetty ... vs The President, Sri Nanak Jhira ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 10006 Kant

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10006 Kant
Judgement Date : 30 June, 2022

Karnataka High Court
Mallamma W/O Late Ramesh Mashetty ... vs The President, Sri Nanak Jhira ... on 30 June, 2022
Bench: Rajendra Badamikar
                             1




          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
                 KALABURAGI BENCH
        DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE 2022
                          BEFORE

     THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
               MFA No.200362/2019 (MV)
BETWEEN:

1.     Mallamma W/o Late Ramesh Mashetty,
       Aged about 41 years, Occ: Household,

2.     Swati D/o Late Ramesh Mashetty,
       Aged about 19 years, Occ: Student,

3      Vaishnavi D/o Late Ramesh mashetty,
       Aged about 17 years, Occ: Student,

4      Vinayak S/o Late Ramesh Mashetty,
       Aged about 15 years, Occ: Student,

5      Gurnath S/o Late Ramshetty Mashetty,
       Aged about 68 years, Occ: Nil,

6      Tejamma W/o Gurunath Mashetty,
       Aged about 63 years, Occ: Household,

       Appellants No.3 & 4 are minor
       U/G of their mother appellant No.1
       All are R/o Village Koutha (B),
       Tq. Aurad (B), Dist. Bidar
       Now residing at Hiremath Colony,
       Basavakalyan, Dist. Bidar.
                                            ... Appellants
(By Sri. Sanjeevkumar C.Patil, Advocate)
                                2



AND:

1.     The President, Sri. Nanak Jhira Saheb,
       Bidar, Represented by
       Balbirsingh S/o Jogashing,
       Age: 53 Years,
       Occ: Business and owner of
       Lorry bearing No.AP-28/W-5394,
       R/o LIG Colony,
       Bidar-584101.

2.     The Divisional Manager,
       Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.,
       Opp. Mini Vidhan Soudha,
       Station Road,
       Kalaburagi-585101.
                                             ... Respondents

(Sri. Uday P.Honguntikar, Advocate for R2;
Notice to R1 is dispensed with)


       This MFA is filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor
Vehicles Act, praying to call for the record and modify the
judgment and award dated 17.02.2017 passed by the IInd
Addl. District and Sessions Court & Addl. MACT Bidar,
sitting   at   Basavakalyan,   in   MVC   No.141/2016,   and
enhance the compensation amount with cost.


       This appeal coming on for admission this day, the
Court delivered the following:
                               3



                       JUDGMENT

This appeal is filed by the appellants-petitioners

under Section 173(1) of M.V.Act, challenging the

judgment and award dated 17.02.2017 passed in MVC

No.141/2016 by the II Addl. District and Sessions

Court & Addl. MACT, Bidar sitting at Basavakalyan.

2. For the sake of convenience, parties are

referred with the ranks occupied by them before the

Tribunal.

3. The factual matrix leading to the case is

that on 22.12.2015 at about 7.15 p.m., while

deceased Ramesh was proceeding from Bidar towards

his village Koutha-B on motorcycle bearing

registration No.KA-32/Q-407, he was hit by the

offending lorry. Hence the petitioners being the

dependants on deceased have filed the claim petition

claiming compensation.

4. After appreciating the oral and

documentary evidence, the tribunal has awarded the

total compensation of Rs.10,95,000/- under the

following heads;

 Sl.No.               Heads                                   Amount
 1.            Loss of dependency                            Rs.9,45,000/-
 2.            Loss of consortium                            Rs.1,00,000/-
 3.            Loss of love and affection                        Rs.25,000/-
 4.            Loss due to transportation                        Rs.25,000/-
            & funeral charges
                      Total                                 Rs.10,95,000/-




5. Being aggrieved by the judgment and

award passed by the tribunal, the appellants-

petitioners have filed this appeal seeking

enhancement of compensation.

6. Heard the arguments and perused the

records.

7. The accident has occurred on 22.12.2015.

the deceased was aged about 42 years as on the date

of the accident. The tribunal has taken the notional

income of the deceased @ Rs.7,500/- per month. As

per the Lok Adalath Chart, this Court is consistently

taking the notional income of Rs.8,000/- per month

for the accident occurred in the year 2015 in the

absence of any other material. Hence, the tribunal has

taken the income of deceased on lower side. Further

the tribunal has not considered future prospects and

considering the age of the deceased, 25% future

prospects are required to be added. The tribunal has

properly applied the multiplier 14 and also deducted

1/4th considering the dependency. Hence, the loss of

dependency would work out to Rs.12,60,000/-

(Rs.10,000/- x 12 x 14 x 3/4)

8. The petitioners are the widow, minor

children and parents of the deceased. Hence, each of

them are entitled for Rs.40,000/- as per the decision

of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satinder

Kaur @ Satwinder Kaur & Ors. v. United India

Insurance Co. Ltd. reported in AIR 2020 SC 3076

and in the case of Magma General Insurance

Company Limited vs. Nanu Ram Alias Chuhru

Ram and others reported in (2018) 18 SCC 130.

9. Further, the petitioners are entitled for

Rs.15,000/- under the head of funeral expenses and

Rs.15,000/- under the head of loss of estate.

10. As such, the petitioners are entitled for

total compensation under various heads as under:

  Sl.No.        Heads                         Amount
    1.      Loss of dependency            Rs.12,60,000/-
    2.      Loss of consortium            Rs.2,40,000/-
    3.      Loss     of    estate    &    Rs.30,000/-
           funeral expenses
                     Total                Rs.15,30,000/-


Hence, the petitioners are entitled for total

compensation of Rs.15,30,000/- along with interest at

the rate of 6% p.a. as against Rs.10,95,000/-

awarded by the Tribunal.

11. Considering these facts and circumstances,

the appeal needs to be allowed in part. Accordingly, I

proceed to pass the following:

ORDER

i. The appeal is allowed in part.

ii. The judgment and award dated 17.02.2017 passed in MVC No.141/2016 by the Tribunal stands modified.

iii. The appellants/petitioners are held entitled for total compensation of Rs.15,30,000/- as against Rs.10,95,000/- awarded by the Tribunal.

iv. The enhanced compensation shall carry interest at the rate of 6% p.a. from the date of petition till its realization.

v. Respondent No.2-insurance company is directed to deposit the enhanced compensation with interest accrued thereon within six weeks from the date of this judgment.

vi. The petitioners are not entitled for interest for the delayed period of 609 days as per order dated 14.03.2019.

vii. The apportionment, deposit and disbursement shall be as per the award of the Tribunal.

Sd/-

JUDGE

msr

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter