Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri.D. Nanjundegowda vs Sri. Srikanth M.P
2022 Latest Caselaw 10574 Kant

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10574 Kant
Judgement Date : 8 July, 2022

Karnataka High Court
Sri.D. Nanjundegowda vs Sri. Srikanth M.P on 8 July, 2022
Bench: H T Prasad
                             1



     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

          DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY 2022

                          BEFORE

     THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD

                MFA No.6922 OF 2019(MV)

BETWEEN:

Sri. D.Nanjundegowda,
S/o Devegowda,
Aged about 59 years,
R/o Behind Court,
Channarayapatna Town
And taluk, Hassan.                           ... Appellant

(By Sri. Byra Reddy, Advocate for
Smt. Kavitha H.C., Advocate)

AND:

1.     Sri. Srikanth M.P.,
       S/o Prakash,
       R/o Madaguddanahalli Village,
       Bagur Hobli, Channarayapatna Taluk,
       Hassan-573201.

2.     The Manager,
       Reliance General Insurance,
       Unnathi Arcade No.5/111
       And 6/112, 1st Floor,
       1st Block, Dr. Rajkumar Road,
       (1st Main Road) Rajajinagar,
       Bangalore-560010.                ... Respondents

(By Sri.D. Vijay Kumar., Advocate for R2:
Notice to R1 is D/W v/o dated: 04.07.2022)
                            2




      This MFA is filed under Section 173(1) of MV Act,
against the Judgment and Award dated: 07.03.2019
passed in MVC No.149/2018 on the file of the Senior Civil
Judge and JMFC., Channarayapatna, partly allowing the
claim petition for compensation and seeking enhancement
of compensation.

      This MFA, coming on for admission, this day, this
Court, delivered the following:

                    JUDGMENT

This appeal under Section 173(1) of Motor

Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the

Act') has been filed by the claimant being aggrieved

by the judgment and decree dated 07.03.2019 passed

by the Senior Civil Judge, Channarayapatna in MVC

No.149/2018.

2. Facts giving rise to the filing of the appeal

briefly stated are that on 07.09.2017 at about 5.30

p.m., the claimant was proceeding on his motorcycle

bearing registration No.KA-13/Y-2127 on the left side

of the road in Iyyarahalli village to Channarayapatna.

At that time, a Maruthi Swift Dzire car bearing

registration No.KA-13/B-9284 being driven by its

driver at a high speed and in a rash and negligent

manner, dashed to the vehicle of the claimant. As a

result of the aforesaid accident, the claimant

sustained grievous injuries and was hospitalized.

3. The claimant filed a petition under Section

166 of the Act seeking compensation. It was pleaded

that he spent huge amount towards medical

expenses, conveyance, etc. It was further pleaded

that the accident occurred purely on account of the

rash and negligent driving of the offending vehicle by

its driver.

4. On service of notice, the respondent No.2

appeared through counsel and filed written statement

in which the averments made in the petition were

denied. The age, avocation and income of the

claimant and the medical expenses are denied. It was

pleaded that the petition itself is false and frivolous in

the eye of law. It was further pleaded that the

accident was due to the rash and negligent riding of

the vehicle by the claimant himself. It was further

pleaded that the driver of the offending vehicle did not

have valid driving licence as on the date of the

accident. It was further pleaded that the liability is

subject to terms and conditions of the policy. It was

further pleaded that the quantum of compensation

claimed by the claimant is exorbitant. Hence, he

sought for dismissal of the petition.

The respondent No.1 did not appear before the

Tribunal inspite of service of notice and was placed

ex-parte.

5. On the basis of the pleadings of the parties,

the Claims Tribunal framed the issues and thereafter

recorded the evidence. The claimant himself was

examined as PW-1 and got exhibited documents

namely Ex.P1 to Ex.P23. On behalf of the

respondents, neither any witness was examined nor

got exhibited documents. The Claims Tribunal, by the

impugned judgment, inter alia, held that the accident

took place on account of rash and negligent driving of

the offending vehicle by its driver, as a result of

which, the claimant sustained injuries. The Tribunal

further held that the claimant is entitled to a global

compensation of Rs.70,000/- along with interest @

9% p.a. and directed the Insurance Company to

deposit the compensation amount along with interest.

Being aggrieved, this appeal has been filed.

6. Sri Byra Reddy, the learned counsel for the

claimant has contended that due to the accident the

claimant has suffered grievous injuries, he was

inpatient for a period of one day, he has spent

Rs.37,190/- towards medical expenses, he has

suffered lot of pain during treatment, the global

compensation awarded by the Tribunal is on the lower

side. Hence, he sought for enhancement of

compensation.

7. On the other hand, Sri D.Vijaya Kumar, the

learned counsel for the Insurance Company has raised

following counter contentions:

Firstly, the injuries suffered by the claimant are

minor in nature, he has not examined the doctor.

Considering the injuries suffered by the claimant the

Tribunal has granted just and reasonable

compensation.

        Secondly,     in view of the law laid down by a

Division      Bench   of   this       Court    in    the     case    of

MS.JOYEETA            BOSE            AND       OTHERS              vs.

VENKATESHAN.V AND OTHERS (MFA 5896/2018

and connected matters disposed of on

24.8.2020), the rate of interest awarded by the

Tribunal at 9% p.a. is on the higher side. Hence, he

sought for dismissal of the appeal.

8. Heard the learned counsel for the parties

and perused the judgment and award.

9. It is not in dispute that the claimant has

sustained injuries in the road traffic accident occurred

due to rash and negligent driving of the offending

vehicle by its driver.

Due to the accident the claimant has suffered

grievous injuries, he has spent Rs.37,190/- towards

medical expenses. He was inpatient for a period of

one day. Considering the injuries suffered by the

claimant, I am of the opinion that in addition to the

compensation awarded by the Tribunal, the claimant

is entitled to a compensation of Rs.40,000/- along

with interest @ 6% p.a.

10. In the result, the appeal is allowed in part.

The judgment of the Claims Tribunal is modified.

The claimant is entitled to a total compensation

of Rs.1,10,000/- as against Rs.70,000/- awarded by

the Tribunal.

In view of the law laid down by a Division Bench

of this Court in JOYEETA BOSE (supra) the

enhanced compensation carries interest @ 6% p.a.

The Insurance Company is directed to deposit

the compensation amount along with interest @ 9%

p.a. (interest @ 6% p.a. on the enhanced

compensation) from the date of filing of the claim

petition till the date of realization, within a period of

six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this

judgment.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Cm/-

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter