Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 41 Kant
Judgement Date : 3 January, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 03rd DAY OF JANUARY, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RACHAIAH
RFA NO.100203/2018
BETWEEN:
H.M.KOTRAIAH @ H.M.KOTRABASAIAH,
S/O. LATE NANDIHALLI MATADA BASAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, HINDU, AGRICULTURIST,
R/O. BANNIKALU VILLAGE,
HAGARABOMMANAHALLI TALUK,
BALLARI, DIST. - 583214
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI. H.R.GUNDAPPA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. KOTRAMMA W/O. LATE KOTRAIAH,
60 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
HINDU, AGRICULTURIST,
R/O. HOLAGUNDI VILLAGE,
HUVINAHADAGALI TALUK,
BALLARI, DIST. - 583214.
2. SUMANGALAMMA W/O. M.M.KOTRAIAH,
50 YEARS, HINDU, AGRICULTURIST,
R/O. SONNA VILLAGE,
HAGARABOMMANAHALLI TALUK,
BALLARI, DIST. - 583214.
3. MALLAMMA W/O. LATE H.M. NAGAIAH,
RFA No.100203/2018
2
56 YEARS, HOUSEHOLD WORK,
HINDU, AGRICULTURIST,
R/O. YELUBAGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE,
HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI TALUK,
BALLARI, DIST. - 583214.
4. H.M.DODDA BASAIAHA,
S/O. LATE NANDIHALLI MATADA BASAIAH,
48 YEARS, HINDU,
AGRICULTURIST,
R/O. K. AYYANAHALLI, VILLAGE.
KUDLIGI TALUK, BALLARI DISTRICT - 583131.
5. KOBBAJJI KASTURAMMA
W/O. LATE KOBBAJJI DODDABASAPPA,
37 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
HINDU, AGRICULTURIST,
R/O. GIREGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE,
HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI TALUK,
BALLARI, DIST. - 583214.
6. GADIHALLI RAMAPPA S/O. THINDAPPA,
57 YEARS, HOUSEHOLD WORK,
HINDU, AGRICULTURIST,
R/O. HANUMAGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE,
HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI TALUK,
BALLARI, DIST. - 583214.
7. HOLAGUNDI DURGAPPA
S/O. DODDA HANUMANTHAPPA,
52 YEARS, HOUSEHOLD WORK,
HINDU, AGRICULTURIST,
R/O. GIREGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE,
HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI TQ.
BALLARI, DIST. - 583214.
8. H.M.SIDDALINGAIAH,
S/O. ANDANAIAH,
58 YEARS, HOUSEHOLD WORK,
RFA No.100203/2018
3
HINDU, AGRICULTURIST,
R/O. YELLUBAGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE,
HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI TALUK,
BALLARI, DIST. - 583214
.. RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VISHWANATH HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2;
R3 TO R8 ARE SERVED AND REMAINED UNREPRESENTED)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 41 RULE 1, R/W.
SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
DATED 28.02.2018 PASSED IN O.S.NO.35/2016 ON THE FILE
OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,
HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT
FILED FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH
PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, DR.
H. B. PRABHAKARA SASTRY, J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the appellant is not present.
2. Learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 and 2
alone is physically present in the Court.
3. Despite passing a peremptory order dated
21.09.2021 by this Court, the appellant has not filed paper
book, nor he has appeared either physically or through video
conference and shown any reasons for non-filing of the paper RFA No.100203/2018
book. In that situation the peremptory order dated
21.09.2021 comes into effect.
4. As a consequence the appeal stands dismissed by
virtue of the peremptory order due to non filing of the paper
book and also for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
*Svh/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!