Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vihappa S/O Rukmappa Goranli vs The State Of Karnataka
2022 Latest Caselaw 202 Kant

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 202 Kant
Judgement Date : 5 January, 2022

Karnataka High Court
Vihappa S/O Rukmappa Goranli vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 January, 2022
Bench: Chief Justice, Suraj Govindaraj
                          -1-


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

      DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2022

                       PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR. RITU RAJ AWASTHI, CHIEF JUSTICE

                         AND

     THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

     WRIT PETITION NO.5713 OF 2009 (GM-RES-PIL)


BETWEEN:


1.     VIHAPPA
       S/O. RUKMAPPA GORANLI
       AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
       OCC: PRESIDENT OF KOPPAL ZILLA
       BACHAV ANDOLANA SAMITI, KOPPAL
       R/O: BHAYYANAGAR, SUDANDA SADANA
       3RD WARD, BHAGYANAGARA - 583 231
       TQ & DIST: KOPPAL

2.     K.B.GONAL (A) MALLIKARJUN
       S/O. BASAPPA GONAL
       AGE 33 YEARS
       OCC: SECRETARY OF KOPPAL ZILLA
       BACHAV ANDOLANA SAMITI, KOPPAL
       R/O: BENKINAGAR, NEAR WATER TAKN
       KOPPAL TQ & DIST, KOPPAL - 583 231

3.     BHARADWAJ
       S/O. SUVVA RAO.J
       AGE 63 YEARS
       OCC: CONVENOR OF K.Z.B.A.X.
       R/O. GANGAWATI, DIST: KOPPAL

4.     D.H.PUJAR (A) DURGAPPA
       S/O. HONUMANTAPA PUJAR
       AGE 42 YEARS
       OCC: CONVENOR OF KOPPAL ZILLA
       BACHAV ANDOLANA SAMITI,
                           -2-


       R/O. DEVRAJ AURUS COLONY, KOPPAL
       TQ & DIST, KOPPAL - 583 231

5.     H.RAGHU
       S/O. H.VENUGOPALAPPA HIREKASANKANDI
       AGE 49 YEARS
       OCC: CONVENOR OF KOPPAL ZILLA
       BACHAV ANDOLANA SAMITI,
       R/O. MUNIRABAD (RS) NEAR SYNDICATE BANK
       SJS FACTORY ROAD (HOSALLI AREA)
       DIST: KOPPAL
                                       ... PETITIONERS

(BY MS.SHILPA PRASAD, ADV. FOR
    SMT.MAITHREYI KRISHNAN, ADV.)

AND:

1.     THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
       BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
       REVENUE DEPARTMENT
       M.S.BUILDING
       BANGALORE - 560 001

2.     THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
       KOPPAL DISTRICT, KOPPAL

3.     M/S. AARESS IRON & STEEL LTD.
       HOSPET, BY ITS MANAGIND DIRECTOR
       HOSPET TALUK, BELLARY DISTRICT.
                                      ... RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI S.RAJASHEKARA, AGA FOR R1 & R2
    SRI M.M.SWAMY, ADV. FOR R3)
                         ---


     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 14.11.2007 VIDE
ANX-A PASSED BY THE R2 AND ETC.


     THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR HEARING THROUGH
VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, CHIEF JUSTICE MADE
THE FOLLOWING:
                                   -3-


                                 ORDER

Heard.

2. This public interest litigation was filed way back

in 2009 seeking following reliefs:

"(i) Issue the writ of certiorari, quashing the impugned Order No:

Revenue/Land/10/2006-07 Dated: 14.11.2007 vide Annexure-A passed by the 2nd respondent.

(ii) Further direct the respondents to maintain the Public Tank situated in Land Sy.No.143 measuring totally 44 acres 35 guntas at Basapur Village in Koppa Taluk and District as it is and make it available for the use of General Public and village cattle.

OR

(iii) Issue such other writ of Order or Direction which this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the circumstances of the above case."

3. Mr.M.M.Swamy, learned counsel appearing for

respondent No.3 informs the Court that the land in question

which was allotted to respondent No.3 by way of

notification was challenged before this Court in a Writ

Petition and the Writ Petition was dismissed vide order

dated 17.03.2009. On appeals being filed in W.A.Nos.6193-

6195 of 2009 and other connected matters, this Court, vide

order dated 22.03.2012, quashed the entire notifications

dated 09.11.2006. Respondent No.3 as well as the State

and the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board have

challenged the said judgment by filing Special Leave

Petition (SLP) before the Apex Court which is pending for

final hearing. It is submitted that the cause for which the

instant writ petition is filed no longer survives.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has made a

prayer for adjournment.

5. We do not find any reason to adjourn the case

as it is one of the oldest matter. We, therefore, dismiss the

writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh

case, in case cause for which the writ petition was filed is

revived. In the meanwhile, the petitioners and other

villagers are permitted to use the water in the tank. The

respondents shall not prevent such usage.

Sd/-

CHIEF JUSTICE

Sd/-

JUDGE

VM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter