Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 123 Kant
Judgement Date : 4 January, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
WRIT PETITION NO.12861 OF 2017 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
GOWRAMMA
W/O. HANUMANTHAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
R/O. GIC-3/B, JANNAPURA,
BHADRAVATHI - 577245,
SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
(BY SMT. S K NAGARATHNA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THAYAMMA
W/O. LATE. THIPPA BHOVI,
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS,
R/O. RAJAIV GANDHI EXTENSION,
BEHIND NCC TRAINING CAMP,
SHIVAMOGGA 577201
2. CHINNAPPA
S/O. THIPPA BHOVI,
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS,
R/O. MILGHATTA, 1ST CROSS,
NEAR CHAMUNDESHWARI DEVASTHANA
SHIVAMOGGA - 577201
2
3. CHOWDAPPA
S/O. LATE. THIPPA BHOVI,
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS,
R/O. 1ST CROSS, ANNANAGAR
SHIVAMOGGA - 577201
4. KRISHNAPPA
S/O. LATE. THIPPA BHOVI,
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,
R/O. MILGHATTA, 1ST CROSS,
SHIVAMOGGA - 577201
5. RAMASWAMY
S/O. LATE. THIPPA BHOVI,
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
BEHIND GURUNATHA SAW MILL, MILGHATTA,
SHIVAMOGGA - 577201
6. P PRAKASH
S/O. LATE. P. PEDDANNA,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
R/O. MILGHATTA, II CROSS,
OPPOSITE TO DURGAMMA TEMPLE,
SHIVAMOGGA - 577201
7. PRASANNA
S/O. LATE A. PEDDANNA,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
R/O. MILGHATTA, II CROSS,
OPPOSITE TO DURGAMMA TEMPLE,
SHIVAMOGGA - 577201
8. PRADEEP
S/O. LATE A. PEDDANNA,
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,
R/O. MILGHATTA, II CROSS,
OPPOSITE TO DURGAMMA TEMPLE,
SHIVAMOGGA - 577201
3
9. RAMYA
D/O. LATE A. PEDDANNA,
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,
R/O. MILGHATTA, II CROSS,
OPPOSITE TO DURGAMMA TEMPLE,
SHIVAMOGGA - 577201
10 . VEENA
D/O. LATE A. PEDDANNA,
AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS,
R/O. MILGHATTA, II CROSS,
OPPOSITE TO DURGAMMA TEMPLE,
SHIVAMOGGA - 577201.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. S V PRAKASH, ADVOCATE FOR R2, R3 & R5)
R1 AND R4 ARE SERVED
R-6 TO R-10 NOTICE DISPENSED WITH VIDE ORDER
DATED 21.06.2017)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES
226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 2.3.2017 PASSED
BY LEARNED II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,
SHIVAMOGGA ON IA NO.16 IN O.S.NO.25/2010
PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-E AND THEREBY ALLOW THE IA
FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER SECTION 151 OF CPC
ORDER XXVI RULE 9 OF CPC IN O.S.NO.25/2010 ON THE
FILE OF LEARNED I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,
SHIVAMOGGA PRODUCED AS PER ANNEXURE-C.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR HEARING
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
4
ORDER
Learned counsel for the respondents submits
that this writ petition is arising out of the suit in
O.S.No.25/2010. He further submits that the suit
came to be disposed of by judgment dated
21.12.2018, and in view of the same, nothing survives
for consideration in this writ petition.
2. Said submission of learned counsel for the
respondents has not been disputed by learned counsel
for the petitioner.
3. In view of the above, nothing survives for
consideration in this writ petition. Accordingly, writ
petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
SD/-
JUDGE
RD
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!