Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Ramesh S vs M/S The Reliance General ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 3161 Kant

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3161 Kant
Judgement Date : 23 February, 2022

Karnataka High Court
Sri Ramesh S vs M/S The Reliance General ... on 23 February, 2022
Bench: P.Krishna Bhat
     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

       DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022

                           BEFORE

        THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. KRISHNA BHAT

               M.F.A.NO.422/2011 (WC)

BETWEEN:

SRI. RAMESH S
S/O SRI. SUBRAMANI,
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
R/AT NO.8/1, 17TH CROSS,
SIDDASHRAMA ROAD,
MALLESHWARAM,
BANGALORE-560003.                             ...APPELLANT

(BY SMT.G.K.SREEVIDYA, ADV. FOR
    SRI.T.N.VISWANATHA, ADV. FOR APPELLANT)

AND:

1.     M/S.THE RELIANCE GENERAL
       INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
       BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER,
       BRANCH OFFICE NO.28,
       EAST WING, 5TH FLOOR,
       CENTENARY BUILDING,
       M.G.ROAD,
       BANGALORE-560001.

2.     SHRI. KESHAV M
       S/O SHRI. NARASIMHAIAH,
       MAJOR, R/AT NO.25,
       22ND MAIN ROAD,
       1ST CROSS, K.P.AGRAHARA,
       MAGADI ROAD,
       BANGALORE-560023.              ...RESPONDENTS
                             2



(BY MR.H.S.LINGARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R1
    RESPONDENT NO.2-D/W)

      THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 30(1) OF W.C. ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT DATED 31.05.2010 PASSED IN CWC/BEM-3/NFC/CR-
38/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE LABUR OFFICER AND
COMMISSIONER FOR WORKMEN COMPENSATION, SUB-
DIVISION-3, BANGALORE, ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION
FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF
COMPENSATION.

      THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                       JUDGMENT

This appeal is at the instance of the claimant calling

in question the legality and correctness of the award dated

31.05.2010 in CWC/BEM-3/NFC/CR-38/2008 passed by the

Commissioner for Workmens' Compensation, Bangalore

Sub-division, Bannerghatta Road, Bangalore.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant advanced two fold

contentions. Firstly, she contends that the functional

disability assessed at 15% by the learned Commissioner is

on the lower side and upon the evidence adduced, it

should be assessed at 25%. Her second contention is that

rate of interest awarded is against express terms of

Section 4 (1) of Employees Compensation Act, 1923. She

therefore, submits that the appeal requires to be allowed.

3. The contention of the learned counsel for the

Insurance Company, per contra, is that, since the only

fracture suffered by the claimant-auto driver who is aged

30 years is the fracture of 10th rib, it is impossible to

conceive that there could be any functional disability on

account of the same and therefore, there is no justifiable

grounds to interfere with the finding of the learned

Commissioner in this behalf. Secondly, he submits that

no injustice is caused to the claimant by the rate of

interest awarded by the learned Commissioner on the

compensation amount and therefore, there is no merit in

the appeal and it is liable to be dismissed.

4. The evidence discloses that, the claimant was aged

about 30 years and he was working as an auto-rikshaw

driver. The medical evidence produced shows that 10th rib

of the claimant was fractured. Under such circumstances,

the learned Commissioner has assessed the functional

disability at 15% and there is no good ground made out to

increase the same in this case.

5. Insofar as the rate of interest awarded is concerned,

learned Commissioner has awarded a split rate of interest

namely 7.50% with effect from one month from the date

of accident till the date of award and thereafter, at the rate

of 12% till the date of deposit. This direction made by the

learned Commissioner is contrary to the express terms of

sub-section 1 of Section 4 of Employees Compensation

Act, 1923. Under the said provisions, the interest is liable

to be paid at the rate of 12% per annum with effect from

30 days from the date of the accident till the date of

deposit. Accordingly, while maintaining the quantum of

compensation awarded, rate of interest payable is modified

to the extent that interest shall be payable at the rate of

12% per annum with effect from 30 days of accident till

the date of deposit. Accordingly, the above appeal is

allowed to the said extent.

6. The insurance company shall deposit the

compensation with interest thereon within six weeks from

the date of receipt of certified copies of this judgment.

7. The records shall be transmitted to the learned

Tribunal forthwith.

Sd/-

JUDGE

JS/-

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter