Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt.Pushpavati @ Kamala vs Smt. Netra
2022 Latest Caselaw 2561 Kant

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2561 Kant
Judgement Date : 16 February, 2022

Karnataka High Court
Smt.Pushpavati @ Kamala vs Smt. Netra on 16 February, 2022
Bench: Dr. H.B.Prabhakara Sastry, S.Rachaiah
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
                  DHARWAD BENCH

     DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022

                      PRESENT

 THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY

                        AND

       THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RACHAIAH

               R.F.A. NO.100468/2019


BETWEEN

1.    SMT.PUSHPAVATI @ KAMALA
      W/O. MANIKCHAND BHADALE,
      AGE: 74 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
      R/O.JAIN GALLI, PASCHAPUR,
      TQ:HUKKERI,
      DIST BELAGAVI-591122

2.    SMT. VAJRAVATI W/O. HIRACHAND KUTTE,
      AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
      R/O. ANKALAGI, TQ: GOKAK,
      DIST BELAGAVI-591101

3.   SMT. ROOPA W/O. MAHAVEER MUTTIN,
     AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
     R/O. MAHAVEER GALLI,
     NEAR MURASAVIR MATHA,
     HUBBALLI, TQ: HUBBALLI,
     DIST: DHARWAD-580020
                                      ...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. SHIVRAJ S BALLOLI, ADV.)
                                   R.F.A.No.100468/2019

                          2


AND

1.    SMT. NETRA W/O. NAGARAJ BHADALE
      AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
      R/O. JAIN GALLI, PASCHAPUR, TQ: HUKKERI,
      DIST.:BELAGAVI-591122.

2.    SMT. SOUMYA D/O. NAGARAJ BHADALE,
      AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,
      R/O. JAIN GALLI, PASCHAPUR, TQ: HUKKERI,
      DIST.:BELAGAVI-591122.

3.    SHRI. SHUBHAM S/O. NAGARAJ BHADALE,
      AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,
      R/O. JAIN GALLI, PASCHAPUR, TQ: HUKKERI,
      DIST.:BELAGAVI-591122

4.    SHRI. ANNAPPA S/O. KALLAPPA MALAJ,
      AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
      R/O.: JAIN GALLI, PASCHAPUR, TQ: HUKKERI,
      DIST.:BELAGAVI-591122.

5.    SHRI RAYAGOUDA S/O. IRAPPA NERALAGI,
      AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
      R/O.: PASCHAPUR, TQ: HUKKERI,
      DIST.:BELAGAVI-591122.

6.    SHRI ADIVEPPA S/O. RAMAPPA SUMBALI,
      AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
      R/O.: KUNDARAGI, TQ: GOKAK,
      DIST.: BELAGAVI-581402.

7.    SMT. BALAVVA W/O. PARASHURAM KUDAJOGI,
      AGE: 69 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
      R/O.: TELAGIN PETE, PASCHAPUR, TQ: HUKKERI,
      DIST.: BELAGAVI-591122.

8.    SMT. GOURAVVA W/O. SANTOSH ADIMANI,
      AGE: 31 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
                                  R.F.A.No.100468/2019

                          3


      R/O.: TELAGIN PETE, PASCHAPUR, TQ: HUKKERI,
      DIST.: BELAGAVI-591122.

9.    SHRI BALAPPA S/O. PARASHURAM KUDAJOGI,
      AGE: 26 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
      R/O.: TELAGIN PETE, PASCHAPUR, TQ: HUKKERI,
      DIST.: BELAGAVI-591122.

10.   SHRI KARTIK S/O. PARASHURAM KUDAJOGI,
      AGE: 24 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
      R/O.: TELAGIN PETE, PASCHAPUR, TQ: HUKKERI,
      DIST.: BELAGAVI-591122.

11.   SHRI ASHOK S/O. SHETTEPPA KUDAJOGI,
      AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
      R/O.: PASCHAPUR, TQ: HUKKERI,
      DIST.: BELAGAVI-591122.

12.   SHRI SANGAYYA S/O. ASHOK UMANBADIMATH,
      AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
      R/O.: PASCHAPUR, TQ: HUKKERI,
      DIST.: BELAGAVI-591122.

13.   SHRI MAHESH S/O. SHIVAPPA SHIRUR,
      AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
      R/O.: SHINDIHATTI, TQ: HUKKERI,
      DIST.: BELAGAVI-591122.
                                       ..RESPONDENTS

     THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC. 96 OF CPC.,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DTD 22.04.2019
PASSED IN O.S.NO.28/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE, HUKKERI, DISMISSING THE SUIT FILED FOR
PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.

     THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THROUGH
PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING HEARING THIS
DAY,  Dr.H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY J., MADE THE
FOLLOWING:
                                        R.F.A.No.100468/2019

                              4



                           ORDER

Learned counsel for the appellants is physically present

and submits that, despite he repeatedly contacting the

appellants / his clients to co-operate him in complying the

office objections by filing application for condonation of

delay, the appellants are not responding. Thus submitting

his helplessness, he submits that, in such a situation, he is

unable to comply office objections.

2. In the light of the above, since already sufficient

opportunities, even as finally and as last chance, have been

granted to the appellants, the appeal stands dismissed for

non-compliance of office objections.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

JUDGE

Bss

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter