Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

B C Puttaraju vs Smt Gowramani
2022 Latest Caselaw 2088 Kant

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2088 Kant
Judgement Date : 9 February, 2022

Karnataka High Court
B C Puttaraju vs Smt Gowramani on 9 February, 2022
Bench: N S Gowda
                            1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

   DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022

                      BEFORE

   THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA

 REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.1269 OF 2019 (SP)

BETWEEN:

B.C.PUTTARAJU,
S/O CHANNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
RESIDENT OF BEHIND POLICE STATION,
ALUR TALUK,
HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 213.
WORKING AS P.T.TEACHER,
SIDDANNAYYA HIGH SCHOOL,
BALEPETE,
SAKALESHPURA TALUK - 573 110.
                                      ... APPELLANT
(BY SRI.S.G.SWAMY, ADV.,)

AND:

SMT.GOWRAMANI,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
W/O SHIVANNA,
GOPALASWAMI VATARA,
2ND CROSS, MISSION HOSPITAL ROAD,
NORTHERN EXTENSION,
HASSAN - 573 210.
                                     ... RESPONDENT

(RESPONDENT IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
                                   2
      THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF
CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
07.03.2017 PASSED IN R.A.NO.33/2013 ON THE FILE OF
THE PRINCIPAL     SENIOR   CIVIL  JUDGE, HASSAN,
DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 09.01.2013 PASSED IN
O.S.NO.454/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC.,HASSAN.

     THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS
DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

                           JUDGMENT

1. The First Appellate Court dismissed the Regular Appeal

on 07.03.2017 and this appeal has been filed on

15.07.2019 with delay of 770 days.

2. In the affidavit accompanying the application seeking

for condonation of delay, it has been stated as follows:

"3. I state that, I am the permanent resident of Alur, Hassan District and as such the appellate court was pleased to pass the judgment and decree on 07/03/2017 by dismissing my appeal. Under the circumstances the respondent has filed the execution petition before the trial court for execution of the judgment and decree and as such I have requested my advocate to file

Vakalath and defend the said execution petition in accordance with law.

4. Thereafter lower court advocate has advice me to prefer the second appeal before the High court of Karnataka at Bangalore and as such I have instructed my advocate on record to file appeal before the higher court. Thereafter I could not contact my advocate for a period of one and half year, due to my ill health and during the 2nd week of June 2019 I have contacted my advocate to status of my case before the High court, at that point of time my advocate has expressed his inability of non filing of the appeal before the High Court, since his practice is in Hassan District and not able to travel to Bangalore to file the appeal and hence you may have to engage different advocate to file the appeal before the High Court at Bangalore, who regularly practicing at Bangalore.

5. Under the circumstances, I have no option, other then approaching the advocate practicing at Bangalore. In the background of the above, I requested my advocate to furnish the copy of the judgment and decrees to

enable me to approach the higher court. However on account of long lapse of time, he could not trace the same and as such I requested him to apply for the certified copy once again and accordingly, he applied for the same on 15/06/2019 and received it on 25/06/2019. Thereafter without any loss of time, I got prepared the present appeal and approached this court."

3. As could be seen from the averments of the affidavit,

the appellant was aware that he had suffered a decree at

the hands of the Appellate Court and an Execution petition

had also been filed seeking to execute the decree and he

had in fact entered appearance through a counsel in the

Execution proceedings.

4. He also admits that he was advised to prefer a second

appeal and had instructed his counsel to file an appeal but

he could not approach his counsel for about 1½ years due

to ill-health. However, nothing is forthcoming as to what

was the ill-health that the appellant was ailing from and no

documents are produced to substantiate this reason.

5. In my view, there is absolutely no cause, much less

sufficient cause shown to condone an inordinate delay of

770 days in filing the appeal. I.A.No.1/2019 is dismissed.

Consequently, the second appeal is also dismissed.

Sd/-

JUDGE

GH

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter