Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11478 Kant
Judgement Date : 22 August, 2022
M.F.A. No.6220/2014
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.6220/2014 (FC)
BETWEEN:
1. R. SUBHADRAMMA
W/O LATE RAMANARASIMHAIAH
AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS
R/AT NO.45
PART AREA, 10TH CROSS
WILSON GARDEN
BANGALORE-27
2. R. MEERA
W/O N VENKATASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
R/AT NO.474, 12TH 1ST A CROSS
8TH MAIN, NEAR TELEPHONE EXCHANGE
IV BLOCK, KORAMANGALA
BANGALORE-34
3. R USHADEVI
W/O SOMASUNDARA BABU
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
R/AT NO.29
BHEEMAJYOTHI CONONY
NEAR SHANKAR MUTT
RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE
4. R. GEETHA
W/O THYAGARAJ
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
M.F.A. No.6220/2014
2
NO.3 OUT HOUSE,
9TH CROSS, PARK AREA
WILSON GARDEN
BANGALORE-27 ...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI V. VINOD REDDY, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
1. R. SUSHEELA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
W/O NOT KNOWN TO THE APPELLANTS
R/AT NO.45, 10TH CROSS
PARK AREA, WILSON GARDEN
BANGALORE-27.
2. R. NIRMALA
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
W/O NOT KNOWN TO THE APPELLANTS
R/AT NO.45, 10TH CROSS
PARK AREA, WILSON GARDEN
BANGALORE-27.
3. DR. R. RAGHUNATH
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE APPELLANTS
R/AT NO.45, 10TH CROSS
PARK AREA, WILSON GARDEN
BANGALORE-27.
4. ACCOUNTANT GENERAL
OFFICE OF THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL
ACCOUNTS AND ENTITLEMENT
POST BOX NO.5329
BANGALORE-560 001
5. R RADHA KUDUR
W/O K.P RAVINDRA
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
NOW R/AT NO.19
MONT CHAIR
SELDEN NY 11707
NEW YORK USA ...RESPONDENTS
M.F.A. No.6220/2014
3
(BY SRI T SESHAGIRI RAO, ADV., FOR R1 & R2 (ABSENT)
NOTICE TO R3 IS HELD SUFFICIENT V/O DATED 21.04.2016
R4 SERVED, NOTICE TO R5 IS DISPENSED WITH
V/O DATED 23.08.2018)
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 19 OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE
THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08.07.2013 PASSED IN
O.S.NO.200/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL. PRL JUDGE,
FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU DISMISSING THE SUIT FILED BY THE
PLAINTIFF.
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR
HEARING THIS DAY, K.S.MUDAGAL J., DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
None appears for the appellants. It appears that the
appellants are not interested in prosecuting the matter.
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE akc
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!