Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11380 Kant
Judgement Date : 16 August, 2022
-1-
CP No. 100132 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
CIVIL PETITION NO. 100132 OF 2021 (-)
BETWEEN:
SMT. GEETA W/O. RAVI PEDESUR
AGE. 28 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK,
PRESENTLY R/O. C/O. BASAVARAJ BABAJI,
JOSHI PLOT - BEHIND COURT BUILDING,
NAVALGUND 582208, DIST. DHARWAD.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B V SOMAPUR.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI. RAVI S/O. VENKAPPA PADESUR
AGE. 36 YEARS, OCC. GOVERNMENT PRIMARY SCHOOL
TEACHER, R/O. NEAR K H PATIL STADIUM,
GADAG 582101. TQ. AND DIST. GADAG.
...RESPONDENT
ANNAPURNA
CHINNAPPA (RESPONDENT SERVED)
DANDAGAL
Digitally signed by THIS CIVIL PETITION IS FILED U/SEC.24 OF CPC, PRAYING
ANNAPURNA
CHINNAPPA
DANDAGAL
Location: HIGH COURT
OF KARNATAKA,
THAT, THE M.C. NO. 143/2018 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT WHICH
DHARWAD BENCH,
DHARWAD
IS PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRL.FAMILY COURT, GADAG, MAY
PLEASE BE WITHDRAWN AND THE SAME BE TRANSFERRED TO THE
HONBLE SENIOR CIVIL COURT, NAVALGUND FOR HEARING, IN THE
INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS CIVIL PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY.
THE COURT MADE/DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING.
-2-
CP No. 100132 of 2021
ORDER
This civil petition is filed under Section 24 of CPC
praying to transfer M.C.No.143/2018 from Principal Family
Court, Gadag to the court of Senior Civil Court, Navalgund.
2. Brief facts leading to the filing of this civil
petition are as under:
The marriage of the petitioner and respondent took
place at Gadag in the year 2016. The petitioner gave birth
to a female child. It alleged that respondent and his
family members started ill-treating the petitioner and
thereafter respondent driven her out from the matrimonial
home. The petitioner filed Crl.Misc.No.197/2018 seeking
maintenance for herself and for her daughter, which is
pending consideration before the Civil Judge and JMFC,
Navalgund. As a counter blast, the respondent filed
divorce petition in M.C.No.143/2018. The respondent
obtained ex-parte decree of divorce against the petitioner.
Immediately, the petitioner filed Civil Misc.No.1/2019 and
the Family Court, Gadag allowed the petition and restored
CP No. 100132 of 2021
M.C.No.143/2018. Hence, the petitioner has filed this civil
petition seeking transfer of M.C.No.143/2018 from
Principal Family Court, Gadag to the court of Senior Civil
Court, Navalgund.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Though notice was served to the respondent, none
appears for the respondent.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
respondent filed M.C.No.143/2018 before the Principal
Family Court, Gadag for dissolution of marriage. He
submits that petitioner has also filed Crl.Misc.No.197/2018
before the Civil Judge & JMFC, Navalgund seeking
maintenance and the respondent has appeared in the said
case. He submits that petitioner being a lady cannot travel
to Gadag without the assistance of third person. He
submits that petitioner has no income to maintain her day-
to-day life and the distance between Navalgund to Gadag
is 60-70 kms. Hence, on these ground he prays to allow
the petition.
CP No. 100132 of 2021
5. Heard, perused the records and considered the
submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner.
6. It is not in dispute that petitioner being a lady
cannot travel without the assistance of third person. The
petitioner has no income to maintain her day-to-day life.
The distance between Navalgund to Gadag is 60-70 kms
and the respondent has not provided any maintenance to
the petitioner. Further, the petition has to be presented
where the wife resides. Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of
N.C.V.Aishwarya vs. A.S.Saravana Karthik Sha
reported in 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 627, held that cardinal
principle for exercise of power under Section 24 CPC is
that the ends of justice should demand the transfer of the
suit, appeal or other proceeding. It is further held that,
when two or more proceedings are pending in different
courts between the same parties which raise common
question of fact and law, and when the decisions in the
cases are interdependent, it is desirable that they should
be tried together by the same Judge so as to avoid
CP No. 100132 of 2021
multiplicity in trial of the same issues and conflict of
decisions. Considering the law laid down by the Hon'ble
Apex Court in the aforesaid judgment and also the facts
and circumstances of the present case, the petition is
liable to be allowed. Accordingly, I proceed to pass the
following:
ORDER
The civil petition is allowed.
The petition filed by the respondent in M.C.No.143/2018 on the file of the Principal Family Court, Gadag is withdrawn and the same is transferred to the court of Senior Civil Court, Navalgund.
The Principal Family Court, Gadag is directed to transmit the records to the court of Senior Civil Court, Navalgund.
The Senior Civil Court, Navalgund after receipt of the records issue notice to the parties.
SD/-
JUDGE
MBS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!