Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11299 Kant
Judgement Date : 8 August, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF AUGUST 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. ALOK ARADHE
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. VISHWAJITH SHETTY
W.A. NO.448 OF 2022 (LA-KIADB)
IN
W.P. NO.7655 OF 2022 (LA-KIADB)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. B.C. SHIVANNA
S/O CHIKKA GANGAIAH @ GANGAIAH
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS.
2. SRI. HANUMANTHARAJU
S/O B.C. SHIVANNA
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS.
BOTH ARE R/AT BASAPPANAPALYA
DODDABELE DHAKLE
THYAMAGONDLU HOBLI
NELAMANGALA TALUK
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT.
... APPELLANTS
(BY MR. HEGDE SHRIPAD GANGADHAR, ADV.,)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS SECRETARY
TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
2
AND INDUSTRY, M S BUILDING
AMBEDKAR VIDHI
BANGALORE-01.
2. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
NO.39, SHANTHINAGAR
BHARATH SCOUTS AND GUIDES BUILDING
4TH FLOOR, PALACE ROAD
BANGALORE-1.
3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER-4
OFFICE OF KARNATAKA DEVELOPMENT BOARD
NO.39, SHANTHINAGAR
BHARATH SCOUTS AND GUIDES BUILDING
4TH FLOOR, PALACE ROAD
BANGALORE-01.
4. SRI. GANESH
S/O CHIKAMUNIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
R/AT BEGUR KASABA HOBLI
NELAMANGALA TALUK
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562123.
5. SRI. V. MAHADEV
S/O LATE M. VENKATESH
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
R/AT DODDABELE VILLAGE
THYAMAGONDLU HOBLI
NELAMANGALA TALUK-562123
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT.
6. SRI. T.L. RAJU
S/O LATE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
R/AT CHANDMOULESHWARA LAYOUT
THYAMAGONDLU HOBLI
NELAMANGALA TALUK-562123
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT.
3
... RESPONDENTS
(BY MR. VIJAY KUMAR A. PATIL, AGA FOR R1 TO R3)
---
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, PRAYING TO PASS AN
ORDER AFTER CALLING FOR RECORDS TO SET ASIDE THE
ORDER DATED 11.4.2022 PASSED IN WP NO.7655/2022 (LA-
KIADB) AND FURTHER BE PLEASED TO ALLOW THE SAID
WRIT PETITION AND GRANTS AND SUCH OTHER RELIEF
ORDER OR DIRECTION.
THIS WRIT APPEAL COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This intra court appeal has been filed against the
order dated 11.04.2022 passed by the learned Single
Judge, by which writ petition preferred by the
appellant has been disposed of.
2. After hearing learned counsel for the
appellant, we deem it appropriate to reserve liberty to
the appellant to seek the relief of injunction against
private respondents restraining them from
withdrawing the amount. Needless to state that in
case, such an application is filed, the trial court shall
advert to the same expeditiously.
Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of.
Sd/-
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
JUDGE
SS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!