Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

United India Insurance Company ... vs Kumari.Sapana Sanappa Mesne
2022 Latest Caselaw 6012 Kant

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6012 Kant
Judgement Date : 4 April, 2022

Karnataka High Court
United India Insurance Company ... vs Kumari.Sapana Sanappa Mesne on 4 April, 2022
Bench: N.S.Sanjay Gowda
                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
                                       DHARWAD BENCH

                           DATED THIS THE 04TH DAY OF APRIL, 2022

                                               BEFORE

                       THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA

                                 MF.A. NO.103615 OF 2015 (MV-I)

                      BETWEEN:

                           UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,
                           THE MANAGER, MARUTI GALLI, BELAGAVI,
                           REP. BY ITS ASSISTANT MANAGER.
                                                                       ... APPELLANT
                      (BY SMT. PREETI SHASHANK, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      1.   KUMARI SAPANA SANAPPA MESNE,
                           AGE 12 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,
                           SINCE MINOR REP. BY HER NATURAL
                           GUARDIAN FATHER
                           SRI.SANAPPA BAIRU MENSE
                           AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: ARMY
                           R/O:MARANHOL, TQ: & DIST: BELAGAVI.

                      2.   SRI. LAXMAN SHATTU PATIL,
                           AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS,
        Digitally          R/O: MARANHOL, POST:SALAMWADI,
        signed by J
        MAMATHA            TQ: & DIST: BELAGAVI-590010.
J       Location:                                                    ...RESPONDENTS
MAMATHA Dharwad       (BY SRI. SANJAY S.KATAGERI, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
        Date:
        2022.04.05     SHRI M.A. HULYAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
        10:30:39
        +0530
                           THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT
                      1988, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & AWARD DATED 08.07.2015,
                      PASSED IN MVC NO.2343/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE IX-ADDITIONAL
                      DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE & MEMBER ADDITIONAL MOTOR
                      ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, BELAGAVI, AWARDING THE
                      COMPENSATION OF RS.5,43,000/- WITH INTEREST AT THE RATE OF
                      9% P.A. FROM 14.11.2014 TILL ITS REALIZATION AND RS.10,000/-
                      WHICH SHALL BE DEPOSITED BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL WITHIN ONE
                      MONTH FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER.
                                        -2-




                                                    MFA No.103615/2015


     THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

                              JUDGMENT

1. In this appeal, the accident is not in d ispute.

The claimant at the time of accident was aged about

12 years and she has suffered fracture of right tibia.

2. The Trib unal has awarded the followings

sums as compensation:

1. Pain and sufferings Rs.50,000/-

2. Future loss of happiness Rs.1,00,000/- and amenities

3. Loss of income to parents Rs.12,000/-

4. Incidental charges Rs.21,000/-

5. Future loss of income Rs.3,00,000/-

   6. Medical expenses                                 Rs.50,000/-
   7. Marriage prospects                               Rs.10,000/-
   8. Future medical expenses                          Rs.10,000/-
                TOTAL                                Rs.5,53,000/-


3. It is the case of the appellant - Insurance

Company that as per the decision of the Hon'ble Apex

Court in the case of Master Mallikarjun Vs.

Divisional Manag er, The National Insurance

Company Limited and Anr. in Civil Ap peal

No.7139/2013, d isposed of on August 26, 2013, the

award of compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- towards loss

MFA No.103615/2015

of unhappiness and amenities cannot be granted. She

also submits that a sum of Rs.50,000/- awarded

towards pain and suffering cannot also be granted.

Learned counsel further contend s that the disability

assessed by the Tribunal at 15% is on the lower side.

4. The Tribunal has assessed the disability at

15% tak ing note of the fact that the Doctor was

examined and he had stated that the claimant had

suffered disability to the extent of 25% to the right

lower limb and he had stated that the claimant had

suffered comminuted fracture, upper 3 r d right tibia and

Fibula with impending compartment syndrome. In my

view, having regard to the fact that the medical

evidence on record, the assessment of permanent

disab ility at 15% cannot be found fault with.

5. Learned counsel for the appellant is however

justified in contending that the sum of Rs.1,00,000/-

awarded towards loss of unhappiness and amenities in

the present case was not called for. It is true that in

all the cases relating to a minor, the loss of amenities

MFA No.103615/2015

would not automatically be granted . In the present

case, hav ing regard the to the injuries suffered, the

award of Rs.1,00,000/- towards loss of unhappiness

and amenities would be improper. Therefore, the

award of Rs.1,00,000/- award ed towards loss of

unhappiness and amenities is disallowed.

6. In all other respects, the compensation

awarded by the Tribunal is just and proper and the

same do not call for any interference.

7. Thus, the claimants would be entitled to a

total compensation as follows:

1. Pain and sufferings Rs.50,000/- 2 Loss of income to parents Rs.12,000/- 3 Incidental charges Rs.21,000/- 4 Future loss of income Rs.3,00,000/-

      5 Medical expenses                                Rs.50,000/-
      6 Marriage prospects                              Rs.10,000/-
      7 Future medical expenses                         Rs.10,000/-
                  TOTAL                               Rs.4,53,000/-


       8.        Accordingly,        the     appeal        filed   by      the

appellant - Insurance Company is allowed in part, the

judgment and award passed by the Trib unal is

modified.

MFA No.103615/2015

9. The claimants would be entitled to a total

compensation of Rs.4,53,000/- instead of

Rs.5,53,000/- awarded by the Tribunal along with

interest at the rate of 6% p.a. from the date of

petition till its realization.

10. The appellant - Insurance C ompany is

directed to deposit the entire compensation amount

along with interest excluding the amount in deposit, if

any, before the Tribunal within six weeks from the

date of receip t of a certified copy of this judgment.

11. On deposit of the entire compensation

amount, the claimant would be entitled to withdraw a

sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees two lakhs) only and the

remaining compensation amount shall be kept in fixed

deposit in any nationalized Bank for a period of five

years. In the event, the marriage of the claimant is

fixed before the expiry of five years, liberty is

reserved to the claimant to seek for release of the

remaining amount.

MFA No.103615/2015

12. The amount in deposit, if any, before this

Court be transmitted to the Tribunal for disbursement

and excess amount in deposit, if any, be refunded to

the appellant-Insurance Company.

Sd/-

JUDGE Vnp*

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter