Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5119 Kant
Judgement Date : 30 November, 2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.6207/2018
BETWEEN
1. SRI. NATARAJ
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
S/O SRI M. N. NANJAPPA
R/AT HOUSE NO 173
12TH MAIN, 22ND CROSS
'D' BLOCK, J. P. NAGAR
MYSRUU - 570 008
2. SMT. LAKSHMI
W/O SRI. NATARAJ
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
R/AT HOSUE NO. 173
12TH MAIN, 22ND CROSS,
"D" BLOCK, J. P. NAGAR
MYSURU - 570 008
3. SMT. PRIYANKA
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
D/O SRI NATARAJ
W/O KUMARESAN V
R/AT B 16, 3RD FLOOR,
SUDHARMA APARTMENTS,
A. K. SAMY NAGAR,
1ST STREET, KILPAUK
CHENNAI -10
ADDRESS AS SHOWN IN COMPLAINT
R/AT HOUSE NO.173,
12TH MAIN, 22ND CROSS,
2
"D" BLOCK, J.P NAGAR,
MYSURU - 570 008
... PETITIONERS
[BY SRI. VENKATESH. R.
(VIDEO CONFERENCING)]
AND
1. THE STATE
BY HALENAGARA POLICE STATION
BHADRAVATHI - 577 301
SHIMOGA DISTRICT
IN THE HIGH COURT
BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
2. SMT NANDINI
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
W/O SRI M.N. MANJUNATH @ MALLESH
HOUSE NO 204
R/AT. N. S. T. ROAD,
BHADRAVATHI - 577 301
SHIMOGA DISTRICT
... RESPONDENTS
[BY SRI. R.D. RENUKARADHYA, HCGP FOR R1
(PHYSICAL HEARING)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION
482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED
01.02.2018 TAKING COGNIZANCE OF THE OFFENCES
P/U/S 498A, 504, 506 R/W 34 OF IPC IN C.C.NO.181/2018
(PCR.NO.11/2017, CR.NO.52/2017) PENDING ON THE FILE
OF THE II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,
BHADRAVATHI AND CONSEQUENTLY ORDERING TO
REGISTER AS CRIMINAL CASE, AS ANNEXURE-A AND
ALSO THE CHARGE SHEET FILED BY THE CRIMINAL CASE
AT ANNEXURE-A AND ALSO THE CHARGE SHEET FILED
BY THE HALENAGAR POLICE, BHADRAVTH AT
3
ANNEXURE-B AND ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS
PURSUANT THERE TO.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
An interim order in this petition was granted on
10.06.2019 and was continued on 30.08.2019. This
Court, on 24.03.2021 after hearing the matter, opined
that the matter required consideration and admitted it
for its final hearing and an interim order granted was
extended until further orders.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the
petitioners submits that notwithstanding the interim
order being extended until further orders by this Court
after admitting the matter for its final hearing, the Trial
Court is seeking to proceed with the matter on the score
of the judgment rendered by the Apex Court in the case
of Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Pvt. Ltd. and
another vs. Central Bureau of Investigation1.
3. Therefore, in the light of the matter after
being heard and admitted for its final hearing and the
interim order continued until further orders, the trial
Court shall not proceed with the matter during the
pendency of this petition.
Ordered accordingly.
With the aforesaid reasons, the criminal petition
stands disposed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
KG
1 (2018) 16 SCC 299
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!