Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5110 Kant
Judgement Date : 30 November, 2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
W.A. NO.962 OF 2021 (S-RES)
IN
W.P.No.56826 OF 2015 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
BHATKAL EDUCATION TRUST (R)
REPRESENTD BY THE CHAIRMAN
THE NEW ENGLISH SCHOOL
DR. SURESH VITAL DAS NAYAK
S/O VITAL DAS NAYAK
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS
NEAR LAITHA SHANABHAG KALAA MANTAPA
BANDAR ROAD, BHATKAL - 581320.
... APPELLANT
(BY MR. RAGHAVENDRA G, ADV.,)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
(PRIMARY AND SECONDARY)
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION
VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560001.
2. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560001.
2
3. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION
DHARWAD - 580008.
4. THE DIRECTOR AND APPELLATE AUTHORITY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION
DHARWAD - 580008.
5. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS
KARWAR-581301.
6. SMT. RAJAM HICHKAD
D/O LATE CHANDRAHAS
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
ASSISTANT TEACHER
NEW ENGLISH SCHOOL
BHATKAL 581320.
7. THE HEAD MASTER
THE NEW ENGLISH SCHOOL
NEAR LAITHA SHANABHAG KALAA MANTAPA
BHANDAR ROAD, BHATKAL 581320.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY MR. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA)
---
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS. ALLOW THIS
WRIT APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 30.06.2021
PASSED IN W.P. NO. 56826/2015 PASSED BY THE LEARNED
SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. PASS ANY OTHER
ORDERS, AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT AND PROPER IN
THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE PRESENT CASE.
THIS W.A. COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS
DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
3
JUDGMENT
Mr.Raghavendra G., learned counsel for the appellant.
Mr.G.V.Shashikumar, learned Additional Government
Advocate for the respondent.
In this intra Court appeal, the appellant has assailed
the validity of the order dated 30.06.2021 passed by the
learned Single Judge, by which the learned Single Judge has
set aside the order passed by the Appellate Authority and has
remitted the matter back to the Appellate Authority to hear
the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with
law.
2. After hearing the learned counsel for the appellant,
it is clarified that the appellant shall be at liberty to raise a
contention that the appeal itself is barred by limitation and
cannot be entertained. In case such a contention is raised,
the Appellate Authority shall advert to the same after giving
an opportunity of hearing to the respondent No.6.
With the aforesaid liberty, the appeal is disposed of.
3. In view of the disposal of the appeal, the pending
interlocutory application does not survive for consideration
and is accordingly disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
RV
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!