Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2174 Kant
Judgement Date : 9 June, 2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE 2021
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
I.T.A. NO. 214 OF 2016
BETWEEN:
SRI G VENKATESH
NO.199, 16TH MAIN
4TH T BLOCK, JAYANAGAR
BANGALORE-560 041 ... APPELLANT
(BY SRI V. CHANDRASHEKAR FOR SRI M. LAVA, ADV.,)
AND:
INCOME TAX OFFICER
WARD-4(1)
UNITY BUILDING ANNEXE
KALINGA RAO ROAD
BANGALORE 560 027 ... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.)
---
THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF
INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED
23.10.2015 PASSED IN ITA NO.1351/BANG/2013 FOR THE
ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07, PRAYING TO:
(i) TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF
LAW AS STATED ABOVE AND ANSWER THE SAME IN FAVOUR
OF THE APPELLANT.
(ii) TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE
FINDINGS TO THE EXTENT AGAINST THE APPELLANT IN THE
ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
2
BANGALORE 'C' BENCH, IN ITA NO.1351/BANG/2013
RELATING TO ASSESSMENT YEARS 2006-07 VIDE ITS
ORDER DATED 23.10.2015 ETC.,
THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,
ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Mr. V.Chandrashekar, learned counsel for the Assessee.
Mr. K.V. Arvind, learned counsel for the revenue.
This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,
1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short) challenging
the order dated 23.10.2015 passed by the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench in ITA
NO.1351/Bang/2013 for the Assessment Year 2006-07.
2. The learned counsel for the assessee submits
that pursuant to the order passed by the Tribunal, the
Assessing Officer has passed order under SEction 143(3)
read with Section 254 of the Act against which the appellant
had filed appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeal), Against the order of the Commissioner of Income
Tax (Appeal), the appellant filed appeal before the Tribunal
in ITA No.703/Bang/2019 and the appellant has already
availed the benefit of "Vivad Se Vishwas' scheme. Learned
counsel for the assessee, therefore seeks leave of this Court
to withdraw the appeal with a liberty to revive the same if
occasion so arises.
3. In view of the aforesaid submission, the appeal is
disposed of in terms of the liberty as prayed for.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
HR
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!