Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2742 Kant
Judgement Date : 9 July, 2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR.ABHAY S. OKA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
C.C.C. NO. 255 OF 2021 (CIVIL)
BETWEEN:
CHAITANYA GEO SURVEYS
SRI LAKSHMI NIVAS, 1ST FLOOR
D. NO.98b/37, SHANTHINAGAR
HOSPET-583 201
KARNATAKA
REPD. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER
KALI PRASAD SB, AGED 49 YEARS
S/O LATE R.H.BHASKAR.
... COMPLAINANT
(BY SMT.RITU RAJESH, ADVOCATE FOR
SMT.ANUPARNA BORDOLI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI KUMAR NAIK
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AND INDUSTRIES
(MINES, SSI & TEXTILES)
1ST FLOR, VIKASA SOUDHA
BENGALURU-560 001.
2. D.S.RAMESH
DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF MINES
& GEOLOGY
KHANIJA BHAVAN
2
RACE COURSE ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
3. MAHAVEER
DEPUTY DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF MINES & GEOLOGY
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
3RD FLOOR, PARWAZ PLAZA
COLLEGE ROAD
HOSAPETE-583 104.
... ACCUSED
4. STATE OF KARNATAKA
THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AND INDUSTRIES
(MINES, SSI & TEXTILES)
1ST FLOR, VIKASA SOUDHA
BENGALURU-560 001.
... PRO FORMA RESPONDENT NO.4
(BY SHRI S.S.MAHENDRA, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT
ADVOCATE)
---
THIS C.C.C. IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12
OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 PRAYING TO
HOLD THE ACCUSED GUILTY OF CONTEMPT OF COURT
FOR WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS
HON'BLE COURT DATED 09.12.2020 MADE IN WP.
NO.10392/2020 AND FURTHER BE PLEASED TO PUNISH
THE ACCUSED HEREIN WITH IMPRISONMENT OF SIX
MONTHS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE
CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 AND FURTHER BE
PLEASED TO DIRECT THE ACCUSED TO COMPLY THE
JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT DATED 09. 12.2020
MADE IN WP. NO.10392/2020, AND ETC.
THIS C.C.C. COMING ON FOR ORDERS THROUGH
VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, CHIEF JUSTICE MADE
THE FOLLOWING:
3
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the
complainant states that in view of what is stated in
the affidavit of Shri K.A.Mahaveera on 8th July,
2021 and the order annexed thereto, there is a
substantial compliance of the order of which breach
is alleged.
2. In view of this submission, the contempt
petition is disposed of. The pending interlocutory
application does not survive for consideration and it
is accordingly disposed of.
Sd/-
CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
JUDGE
vgh*
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!