Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Alumelamma vs Govindaraja K. V.
2021 Latest Caselaw 656 Kant

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 656 Kant
Judgement Date : 11 January, 2021

Karnataka High Court
Smt. Alumelamma vs Govindaraja K. V. on 11 January, 2021
Author: Dr.H.B.Prabhakara Sastry
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

   DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021

                          BEFORE

THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY

  MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL No.8 OF 2017


BETWEEN:


Smt. Alumelamma
D/o late Chikka Thimmappa
W/o Rangaiah,
Aged about 68 years
(senior citizenship not claimed)
R/o T. Gollahalli
Bellavi Post, Tumakuru Taluk,
Tumakuru District - 572 107.
                                   ... APPELLANT

(By Sri K.R. Ramesh, Advocate)

AND:

1. Govindaraja K.V.,
S/o Venkataramanappa
Aged about 46 years.

2. Janardhana,
S/o Venkataramanappa
Aged about 39 years.

Both are r/o Keregalapalya
Kasaba Hobli, Madhugiri Taluk
Tumakuru District - 572 132.
                                     MSA 8/2017
                                2


3. Radhamma
W/o Krishnappa
Aged about 65 years.

4. Krishnappa
S/o late Krishnappa
Aged about 36 years.

5. Seenappa
S/o Venkataramanappa
Aged about 38 years.

6. Sreekantha
S/o Eralingappa
(since dead by LR:

6(a) Harish
S/o late Sreekantha
Aged about 25 years.

7. Huchamma
D/o Thimmaiah
Aged about 78 years.


Respondents 3 to 7 are
R/o Keregalapalya,
Kasaba Hobli, Madhugiri Taluk
Tumakuru District - 572 132.


8. Dasappa
S/o Chikkamma & Chikkabyatanna
Aged about 83 years.

9. Eradimmaiah
S/o Chikkamma & Chikkabyatanna
Aged about 75 years.


Respondents 8 and 9 are
R/o Hariharapura
                                                MSA 8/2017
                               3


Dodderi Hobli
Madhugiri Taluk,
Tumakuru District - 572 132.
                                          ... RESPONDENTS

 (R1, R2, R6(a) to R9 are served;
  Appeal against R3 & R5 dismissed
  Vide Order dated 05.07.2019)

      THIS   MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
ORDER XLIII RULE 1(U) OF CPC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT    AND   DECREE  DATED   29.09.2016,  PASSED   IN
R.A.NO.44/2013, BY ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,
MADHUGIRI AND THEREBY CONFIRM THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
PASSED IN O.S. NO.270/2008 BY THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR
DIVISION), MADHUGIRI DATED 23.10.2010, IN THE INTEREST OF
JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

      THIS  MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR
ORDERS THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                          ORDER

Learned counsel for the appellant filed a memo not

pressing the present appeal.

In view of the memo and supporting submissions by

the learned counsel for the appellant who is physically

present in the Court, the appeal stands dismissed as not

pressed.

Sd/-

JUDGE sac*

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter