Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri. M. Manjunath vs Kumari. Renukamma
2021 Latest Caselaw 308 Kant

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 308 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 January, 2021

Karnataka High Court
Sri. M. Manjunath vs Kumari. Renukamma on 6 January, 2021
Author: B.V.Nagarathna And Uma
                              1



  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

        DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021

                        PRESENT

       THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA

                         AND

           THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE M.G.UMA


 MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.2336 OF 2016 (FC)

BETWEEN:

SRI.M.MANJUNATH
SON OF MUNAIAH
AGE:38 YEARS
RESIDING AT GUTTAHALLI VILLAGE
KARAMANGALA POST
KASABA HOBLI
TALUK: BANGARPET
DISTRICT:KOLAR.
                                      ... APPELLANT

(BY SRI:VEERANNA G.TIGADI, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))

AND:

KUMARI RENUKAMMA
DAUGHTER OF NARAYANAPPA
AGED: 33 YEARS
I FLOOR, GUTTAHALLI VILLAGE
KARAMANGALA POST
KASABA HOBLI
TALUK BANGARPET
DISTRICT:KOLAR.
                                         ... RESPONDENT

(BY SRI:UDHAYA KUMAR G., ADVOCATE(VC))
                                2



      THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 28(1) OF HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29.02.2016 PASSED ON M.C.
NO.35 OF 2003 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE, AND JMFC, K.G.F. DISMISSING THE PETITION
FILED UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT.

     THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR
ADMISSION THIS DAY, NAGARATHNA, J., DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:

                      JUDGMENT

This appeal has been listed on several dates. On

24.09.2020, there was no representation on behalf of both

the sides. Once again, the position remained the same on

05.10.2020. There was no representation on behalf of

both the sides. Hence, the matter was listed on

12.10.2020. On 12.11.2020, there was no representation

on behalf of the appellant. In the interest of justice, the

matter was ordered to be listed on 23.11.2020.

Thereafter, the matter was listed on other dates. Today,

the matter has been called out twice. Once again, there is

no representation on behalf of the appellant.

2. In the circumstances, it appears that the

appellant is not interested in prosecuting this appeal. The

appeal is hence dismissed for non prosecution.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

JUDGE

*bgn/-

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter