Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6294 Kant
Judgement Date : 16 December, 2021
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE M.G.UMA
CRL.P NO.100710/2021
BETWEEN
1. RAJ KIRAN S/O VIRUPAKSHAPPA
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
OCC. SOFTWARE ENGINEER,
R/O. AT NO.2518, 9TH A CROSS,
13TH MAIN, E-LAYOUT, SAHAKARANAGARA,
BANGALORE 560092.
2. VIRUPAKSHAPPA S/O LATE BASAPPA J.
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
OCC. RETIRED PERSON.
R/AT. NO.2518, 9TH A CROSS,
13TH MAIN, E-LAYOUT, SAHAKARANAGARA,
BANGALORE 560092.
3. BHUVANESWARI W/O VIRUPAKSHAPPA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
OCC. HOUSE WIFE,
R/AT NO.2518, 9TH A CROSS,
13TH MAIN, E-LAYOUT, SAHAKARANAGARA,
BANGALORE 560092.
4. SHASHI KIRAN S/O VIRUPAKSHAPPA
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
OCC. ENGINEER, R/O. AT 2518,
9TH A CROSS, 13TH MAIN,
E-LAYOUT, SAHAKARINAGARA,
BANGALORE 560092.
...PETITIONERS
-2-
(BY SRI.HEMANTH KUMAR.K., ADV.)
AND
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
KOTTUR POLICE STATION, KOTTURU,
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING, DHARWAD 580011
2. SMT. K. SOUMYA W/O RAJ KIRAN E
W/O RAJ KIRAN D/O THIPPESWAMY
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
OCC. ENGINEER
R/AT. NEAR KOLASHANTESWARA,
HIGH SCHOOL,
KOTTUR 583134.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.PRAVEEN K.UPPAR, HCGP FOR R1,
SRI.J.S.SHETTY, ADV. FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C.,
SEEKING TO QUASH FIR/COMPLAINT IN CRIME NO.19/2021
REGISTERED BY THE KOTTUR POLICE STATION, KOTTUR, FOR THE
OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 498(A) OF INDIAN PENAL
CODE ALONG WITH 3 AND 4 OF DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT, NOW THE
CASE IS PENDING ON THE FILES OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE AND JMFC, KUDLIGI.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
ORDER
Though the matter is listed for admission, with consent of
the learned counsel appearing for the parties, it is taken up for
final disposal
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and
respondent No.2.
3. Respondent No.2 as the informant filed the first
information against accused Nos.1 to 4 alleging commission of
the offence punishable under Section 498A of IPC and Sections 3
and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. On the basis of the same, FIR in
crime No.19/2021 of Kottur police station was registered. During
investigation, accused Nos.1 to 4 have approached this court
invoking the inherent jurisdiction of this court under Section 482
of Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings initiated
against them.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners filed the memo
dated 27.09.2021 stating that the dispute between the parties is
already settled and respondent No.2/informant has agreed to
withdraw all the cases including the present one which were
instituted by her against the petitioners.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners produced copy of
the judgment dated 30.08.2021 passed in M.C.No.46/2021 on
the file of the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Kudligi which was
filed by petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 under Section 13-B
of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking decree of divorce by
mutual consent, which was came to be allowed and the marriage
between accused No.1 and respondent No.2 was dissolved by
decree of divorce by mutual consent. The petitioners have also
produced affidavits sworn by accused No.1 and respondent No.2
in the said M.C.No.46/2021 wherein respondent No.2 specifically
stated that she has no objection to allow the criminal petition
filed by petitioner No.1 in Crl.P.No.100710/2021 i.e., the present
petition, pending before this court registered for the offence
punishable under Section 498A of IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of
D.P.Act.
6. In view of these developments, learned counsel for
the petitioners prays to allow the petition and quash the criminal
proceedings pending against the petitioners before the trial
court.
7. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 endorsed the
submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and
submitted that respondent No.2 has no objection to allow the
petition and quash the criminal proceedings. The said submission
of the learned counsel for respondent No.2 is placed on record.
8. Petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 are admittedly
the husband and wife. It is stated that there was marital discard
between them which led to filing of the criminal complaint and
initiation of criminal proceedings. Now the marriage between
them is already dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual
consent. Respondent No.2 has withdrawn all the complaints and
also allegations made against the petitioners. Under such
circumstances, I do not find any reason to continue the criminal
proceedings initiated against the petitioners. Quashing the
criminal proceedings will enable the parties to have a peaceful
life of their own. Hence, I am of the opinion that the criminal
proceedings is liable to be quashed. Accordingly, I proceed to
pass the following:
ORDER
The criminal petition is allowed.
The criminal proceedings initiated against the petitioners in
crime No.19/2021 of Kottur police station registered for the
offence punishable under Section 498A of IPC and Sections 3
and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act is quashed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
MBS/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!