Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6120 Kant
Judgement Date : 14 December, 2021
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. RITU RAJ AWASTHI, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
WRIT PETITION NO.5392 OF 2020 (GM-POL)
BETWEEN:
PROTECTIVE COATINGS PRIVATE LIMITED
B-264, II STAGE, PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA
BENGALURU -560 058
REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS DIRECTOR
MR.M.DEVARAJAIAH
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI VARAHAGIRI VINAY GIRI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICER
REGIONAL OFFICE - PEENYA
KARNATAKA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
URBAN ECO PARK, 100 FEET ROAD
3RD PHASE, PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA
BENGALURU - 560 058
2. KARNATAKA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
"PARISARA BHAVANA", NO.49, 4TH AND 5TH FLOORS
CHURCH STREET, BANGALORE-560 001
REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS CHAIRMAN
...RESPONDENTS
(BY MS KRISHIKA VAISHANAV, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI A.MAHESH CHOWDHARY, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
IMPUGNED DEMAND NOTICE DATED 30.01.2020 AT ANNEXURE-
B ISSUED BY THE R-1.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
THIS DAY, SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM J. MADE THE
FOLLOWING:
-2-
ORDER
This petition is filed challenging the impugned
demand notice dated 30.1.2020 as per Annexure-B issued
by respondent No.1 to pay Rs.25,00,000/- towards
environmental compensation.
2. Sri. A. Mahesh Chowdhary, learned counsel for
the respondents has placed before us the copy of the order
dated 24.11.2021 passed by this Court in W.P.6743/2021.
Placing reliance on this judgment, learned counsel
appearing for the respondents-Karnataka State Pollution
Control Board(KSPCB) submits that the demand notice
which is issued by the KSPCB is based on the orders passed
by National Green Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi. It
is further stated by the counsel that the orders passed by
the National Green Tribunal on the basis of which the
present impugned notice issued is stayed by the Hon'ble
Apex Court in Civil Appeal Diary No.19271/2020. In view of
the subsequent development, he would submit that the
present matter may be disposed of. However, he further
submits that the present impugned notice issued by
respondent No.1 would be subject to the decision in the
Civil Appeal pending before the Hon'ble Apex Court.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has no
objection.
4. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of in
terms of the statement made by the learned counsel
appearing for the respondents-KSPCB.
Sd/-
CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
JUDGE
VM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!