Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6013 Kant
Judgement Date : 13 December, 2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2021
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R. DEVDAS
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.200328/2016 (LAC)
BETWEEN:
Kalyan Rao
S/o Bagavanthraya
Aged about 45 years
Occ: Agriculture
R/o Ambalaga
Taluk: Aland
Dist: Kalaburagi-58314
... Appellant
(By Smt. Shailaja C.D., Advocate for
Smt. Ratna N. Shivayogimath, Advocate)
AND:
1. The Chief Engineer
Karnataka Niravari Nigam Limited
IPC, Zone Kalaburagi-585102
2. The Executive Engineer
Karnataka Niravari Nigam Limited
Gandorinala Division
Mahagaon-585102
2
3. The Spl. Land Acquisition Officer
M & MIP
Kalaburagi-585102
4. The Deputy Commissioner
Kalaburagi-585102
... Respondents
(By Sri Gourish S. Khashampur, Advocate for R1 and R2;
Sri Mallikarjun C. Basareddy, HCGP for R3 and R4)
This MFA is filed under Section 54(1) of the Land
Acquisition Act, praying to allow this appeal and grant
enhanced compensation by determining enhanced market
value in respect of the land of the appellant by modifying the
judgment and award dated 17.11.2015 passed in LAC
No.7/2009 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge at Aland, with
all consequential statutory benefits and interest thereon as
per law.
This appeal coming on for final hearing this day,
R.Devdas J., delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
R. DEVDAS J., (ORAL):
Learned counsel for the appellant brings to the
notice of the Court a decision of the Co-ordinate Bench
of this Court in batch of Miscellaneous First Appeals in
MFA No.201595/2016 and connected matters, which
were disposed of on 22.07.2021. The learned counsel
submits that the common judgment is in respect of the
very same preliminary notification dated 15.09.2005
and another preliminary notification dated 24.08.2006.
The lands are also situated in the same village i.e.
Ambalga village, Aland Taluka, Kalaburagi District.
2. We find that as in the present case, the SLAO
had passed award fixing the market value of the land at
`69,750/- per acre. The Reference Court in LAC
No.36/2009 passed judgment and award enhancing the
compensation to `2,42,000/- per acre. In the present
case, in LAC No.7/2009 the Reference Court has
enhanced the compensation to `1,86,000/- per acre.
Having considered the fact that in another MFA
No.31613/2012 clubbed with other matters dealing with
a notification dated 09.03.2006 for the purpose of
Bhima Lift Irrigation Project, the compensation was
determined at `4,15,000/- per acre. In various other
judgments in respect of similarly situated notifications,
the Co-ordinate Bench observed that compensation at
the rate of `4,15,000/- per acre for wet land was
awarded.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents - KNNL
admits that the award as enhanced in MFA
No.31613/2012 at the rate of `4,15,000/- per acre for
wet land has been satisfied.
4. Consequently, we proceed to pass the
following:
ORDER
The appeal is allowed in part, with costs. The
appellant is entitled for compensation at the rate of
`4,15,000/- per acre in respect of the wet lands along
with all statutory benefits.
Ordered accordingly.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE swk
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!