Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5583 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 December, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL No.517 OF 2017
BETWEEN:
SMT.KAPILA SAIGAL
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
D/O SRI.NARENDRA RAGHUNATHADAS SAIGAL
NO.912/913, GANGAPPA TOWER, 4TH FLOOR
OUTER RING ROAD, BELANDUR
BENGALURU-560 037.
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI.IMRAN PASHA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. M/S GAJANANA ENTERPRISES
INDANE GAS DISTRIBUTORS
30-B, 16TH MAIN ROAD, 4TH BLOCK
KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 034.
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER
SRI.M.A. NAIK, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
S/O M.S.NAIK
2. SRI.M.A.NAIK
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
S/O M S NAIK
30-B, 16TH MAIN ROAD, 4TH BLOCK
KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 034.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.GIRIDHAR H., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2)
RFA No. 517/2017
2
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ
WITH ORDER 41 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
07.01.2017 PASSED IN OS NO.5525/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE LIX
ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE BANGALORE CITY, DECREEING
THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY.
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned Counsel for the appellant is appearing through Video
Conference and he has filed a memo dated 02.12.2021 reporting the
death of the appellant on 11.05.2021.
2. A perusal of the previous order sheet would go to show
that the appellant though was imposed cost of Rs.500/- and was
given final chance to file the paper book, he has neither filed the
acknowledgement for having paid the cost nor filed the paper book in
the matter.
3. In the light of the above, the legal representatives of the
appellant were not brought on record even though the sole appellant is
said to have died on 11.05.2021. The appeal stands abated.
Simultaneously, for non-filing of the paper book, the appeal
stands dismissed for non-payment of the cost of Rs.500/-.
RFA No. 517/2017
The beneficiary which is the Legal Services Committee of this Court
is at liberty to recover the said amount from the appellant as
arrears of land revenue and in accordance with law.
In view of the disposal of the appeal, pending I.A. does not
survive for consideration and accordingly stands disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE
JT/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!