Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Nirmal And Ors vs Smt. Padmavati And Ors
2021 Latest Caselaw 5310 Kant

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5310 Kant
Judgement Date : 2 December, 2021

Karnataka High Court
Smt. Nirmal And Ors vs Smt. Padmavati And Ors on 2 December, 2021
Bench: M.G.S.Kamal
                         1




         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
                KALABURAGI BENCH

     DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021

                      BEFORE

       THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.G.S.KAMAL

            MFA No.200247/2019 (CPC)

BETWEEN

1.    SMT. NIRMALBAI W/O ASHOKRAO PATIL
      AGE: 63 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND
      HOUSE HOLD, R/O VILLAGE HUPLA,
      TQ. BHALKI, DIST. BIDAR.

2.    VATSALABAI W/O VENKATRAO SHERIKAR
      AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND
      HOUSE HOLD, R/O VILLAGE KOREKAL,
      TQ. AURAD DIST. BIDAR, NOW RESIDING
      AT AURANGABAD, MAHARASHTRA.

3.    SMT. ARUNA W/O VENKATRAO PATIL
      AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND
      HOUSE HOLD, R/O VILLAGE HAKNAL,
      TQ. AURAD, DIST. BIDAR.

4.    SMT. NANDA W/O DEVIDAR RAO PATIL
      AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND
      HOUSE HOLD, R/O VILLAGE YENGUNDA,
      TQ. AURAD, DIST. BIDAR.

5.    SMT. ANITA W/O RAJU WASRE
      AGE:53 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND
      HOUSE HOLD, R/O VILLAGE EKAMBA,
      TQ. AURAD, DIST. BIDAR.
                           2




6.    SMT. VANDANA W/O PRASHANT
      AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND
      HOUSE HOLD, R/O VILLAGE SORALLI,
      TQ. AURAD, DIST. BIDAR.

7.    SUNITA W/O VENKATRAO
      AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND
      HOUSE HOLD, R/O VILLAGE YELOGOEE,
      TQ. NARAYANKHED, MANNUR MANDAL,
      DIST. MEDAK, TELANGANA

8.    SMT. KAVITA W/O SANTOSH PATIL
      AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND
      HOUSE HOLD, R/O VILLAGE YENGUNDA,
      TQ. AURAD, DIST. BIDAR.
                                       ...APPELLANTS

(BY SRI SACHIN M. MAHAJAN, ADVOCATE)

AND

1.    SMT. PADMAVATI W/O LATE KESHAVRAO
      AGE: 83 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE
      R/O VILLAGE AMIRABAD, NYALKAL MANDAL
      DIST. MEDAK, TELANGANA-502251.

2.    SMT. MANGALA W/O LATE KESHAVRAO
      AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC HOUSEHOLD
      R/O H.NO. 9-11-187, VIDYANAGAR COLONY
      BIDAR-585401.

3.    NITYANAND S/O LATE KESHAVRAO
      AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC NIL R/O H.NO. 9-11-187,
      VIDYANAGAR COLONY, BIDAR-585401.

4.    MISS. JYOTI D/O LATE KESHAVRAO
      AGE: 30 YEARS, OCC NIL R/O H.NO. 9-11-187,
      VIDYANAGAR COLONY, BIDAR-585401.
                           3




5.    MISS. PREETI D/O LATE KESHAVRAO
      AGE: 28 YEARS, OCC NIL R/O H.NO. 9-11-187,
      VIDYANAGAR COLONY, BIDAR-585401.

6.    SMT. NIVEDETHA W/O BASAVARAJ PATIL
      AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE HOLD,
      R/O VILLAGE MARIYAMPUR, NYALKAL MANDAL
      DIST. MEDAK, TELANGANA-502251.

7.    BASAVARAJ PATIL S/O VEERSHETTY PATIL
      AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
      R/O VILLAGE MARIYAMPUR, NYALKAL MANDAL
      DIST. MEDAK, TELANGANA-502251.

8.    SMT. KAVITA W/O UDAYKUMAR KAMTHANE
      AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE HOLD
      R/O AKKAMAHADEVI COLONY, BVB COLLEGE
      ROAD, BIDAR-585401.

9.    NARSHIVE KUMAR S/O TULASIDAS
      AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS
      R/O RANGAREJ GALLI, BIDAR-585401.

10.   DHANARAJ S/O MANIKAPPA DHARAMGONDA
      AGE: 43 YEARS OCC: BUSINES,
      R/O H.NO. 9-12-37, NEAR NANDA
      DEEP BUILDING MAILOOR ROAD,
      VIDYANAGARA COLONY, BIADR-585401.
                                    ...RESPONDENTS

(R4 AND R8 SERVED)

    THIS MFA FILED U/O.XLIII RULE 1(S) OF CPC ACT,
PRAYING THAT THIS HON BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO
CALL FOR RECORDS AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
17.02.2018 PASSED BY THE LEARNED II ADDL.SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT BIDAR, IN O.S.NO.77/2011,
ON I.A.NO.13 AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE I.A.
NO.13 FILED BY THE PLAINTIFFS/APPELLANTS BY
                                  4




ALLOWING THE APPEAL WITH COSTS, IN THE INTEREST
OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

     THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-

                             JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the appellants files a memo

stating that the parties have settled the matter outside the

Court and the suit has been withdrawn in terms of the

settlement. In the circumstances, the above appeal has to

be dismissed as having become infructuous.

The respondents does not dispute the same.

The memo is taken on record.

The appeal is dismissed as having become

infructuous.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Srt

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter