Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3160 Kant
Judgement Date : 17 August, 2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. KRISHNA BHAT
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.147 OF 2011
BETWEEN:
Smt. K.C.Shashikala
W/o. Sri M.G.Mohan
Aged about 32 years
Advocate, R/at No.3
5th 'A' Cross, Subannagarden
Vijayanagar, Bangalore-560 040.
... Appellant
(By Sri.V.B.Shivakumar, Advocate)
AND:
Sri. Rajappa
S/o. Late Munishamappa
Aged about 48 years
R/at No.579, Mahadevapura Post
Hoodi, Shanthinagara
Bangalore-560 005.
... Respondent
(By Smt. Shashikala.K.N., Advocate)
This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 378 (4)
Cr.P.C praying that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to set
aside the order dated 03.11.2010 passed by the Presiding
2
Officer, FTC-VI, Bangalore in Crl.A.No.215/2009 acquitting
the respondent/accused for the offence punishable under
Section 138 of N.I. Act and confirming the order dated
13.02.2009 passed by the XX Addl. Chief Metropolitan
Magistrate, Bangalore in C.C.No.2708/2003
This Criminal Appeal coming on for hearing, this day
through video conference / physical hearing, the Court
delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
This appeal is by the complainant.
None appears for the appellant. There is no
representation.
The case is passed over. The case is called for
the second time and even then, the learned counsel for
the appellant is absent.
The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
SSD
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!