Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3094 Kant
Judgement Date : 2 August, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 2 N D DAY OF AUGUST, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO.104910/2018 (GM-CC)
BETWEEN
RAMESH S/O BASA PPA BIDARI ,
AGE: 29 YEARS , OCC: NIL,
R/O: GUDDAD ANV ERI,
TQ: RANEBENNUR,
DIST: HAVERI.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI LA XMAN T.MANTAGANI, ADVOCATE)
AND
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
BY ITS SECRETARY,
EDUCATION DEPA RTMENT,
VIDHANA SOUDHA ,
BENGLA URU.
2. THE DEPUTY COM MISSIONER,
HAVERI DISTRICT , HAVERI .
3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR
PUBLIC INSTRUCTI ONS,
EDUCATION DEPA RTMENT,
HAVERI DISTRICT , HAVERI .
4. THE DIRECTOR
PUBLIC INSTRUCTI ONS,
EDUCATIN D EPART MENT,
MALLESHWARAM,
BENGALURU.
2
5. THE BLOCK EDUCA TION OFFI CER,
RANEBENNUR, T Q: RANEBENN UR,
DIST: HAVERI.
... RES PONDENTS
(BY SRI V .S.KA LA SURMATH, HCGP)
THIS WRIT PETITI ON IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226
AND 227 OF CONS TITUTION OF INDI A RAYING TO DIRECT
THE RESPONDEN T AUTHORITIES TO CONSIDER THE
REPRES ENTATION S VIDE ANNEXURE-B AND C D ATED
13.06.2016 AND 15.11.2017 RES PECTIVELY AND DIRECT
TO RECTIFY THE CASTE OF THE PETITIONER AS A
"HINDU-HANABAR" IN PLACE OF "HINDU-LINGAVANT" IN
HIS SCHOOL RECORDS AND RECORDS MAINTAINED IN
THE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT IN RESPECT OF
PETITIONER IS CONCERNED.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING IN 'B' GROUP THIS DAY , T HE COURT , MADE THE
FOLLOWING:
ORDER
In this writ petition, the petitioner has sought
for for the following reliefs:
i. Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent authorities to consider the representations vide Annexure-B and C dated 13.06.2016 and 15.11.2017 respectively and direct to rectify the caste of the petitioner as a "Hindu-Hanabar" in place of "Hindu-
Lingavant" in his school records and records maintained in the Education
Department in respect of petitioner is concerned and etc.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner
and learned HCGP for the respondents. Perused the
material on record.
3. Though several contentions are urged by
the petitioner in support of his claim, having regard
to the specific assertions on the part of the petitioner
that his representations at Annexures-B and C dated
13.06.2021 and 15.11.2017 have not been considered
by the respondents and no orders have been passed
so far, without expressing any opinion on the
merits/demerits of the rival contentions, I deem it
just and proper to dispose of this writ petition
directing the concerned respondent/authorities to
consider the said representations, if not already
considered, in accordance with law bearing in mind
the judgment and decree dated 12.02.2015 passed in
Regular Appeal No.77/2014 by the Principal Senior
Civil Judge, Ranebennur, within a period of three
months from the date of receipt of a copy of this
order. Ordered accordingly.
Subject to the aforesaid directions and
observations, writ petition stands disposed of.
SD JUDGE
CLK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!