Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rameshwar Jha vs The State Of Jharkhand Represented ...
2026 Latest Caselaw 894 Jhar

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 894 Jhar
Judgement Date : 9 February, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Jharkhand High Court

Rameshwar Jha vs The State Of Jharkhand Represented ... on 9 February, 2026

Author: Ananda Sen
Bench: Ananda Sen
                                                                  2026:JHHC:3324
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                          W.P.(S) No. 7482 of 2023
                                     ------
      Rameshwar Jha, aged about 62 years, so of Late Shobhakar Jha,
      resident of Village Palasi, PO-Pategana, PS-Palasi, District-Araria,
      Bihar.                                     ... ... Petitioner(s)
                                    Versus

     1.     The State of Jharkhand represented through the Principal
            Secretary, Department of Food, Public Distribution and
            Consumer affairs, Govt. of Jharkhand, having its office at
            Project Building, Dhurwa, PO & PS-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi,
            Jharkhand.
     2.     The Principal Secretary, Department of Food, Public Distribution
            and Consumer affairs, Govt. of Jharkhand, having its office at
            Project Building, Dhurwa, PO & PS-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi,
            Jharkhand.
     3.     The Joint Secretary, Department of Food, Public Distribution
            and Consumer affairs, Govt. of Jharkhand, having its office at
            Project Building, Dhurwa, PO & PS-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi,
            Jharkhand.
     4.     The Director, Department of Food, Public Distribution and
            Consumer affairs, Govt. of Jharkhand, having its office at
            Kadru, PO-Kadru, PS-Argora, District Ranchi.
     5.     The Deputy Commissioner, Dumka, PO & PS-Dumka, District
            Dumka, Jharkhand.
     6.     The District Food and Supply Officer, Dumka, Department of
            Food, Public Distribution and Consumer Affairs, Govt. of
            Jharkhand, having its office at Dumka, PO & PS-Dumka,
            District-Dumka, Jharkhand.               ... ... Respondent(s)
                                       ------
                         CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J.

------

For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinay Kr. Tiwary, Advocate Mr. Vishwanath Moon, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Manish Mishra, GP-V Ms. Adittee Dongrawat, AC to GP-V

------

th 03/ 09 February, 2026

1. Heard the parties.

2. By filing this writ petition, the petitioner is claiming the benefit of 2nd ACP/MACP which according to the petitioner accrued on 04.01.2014, but has not been paid. He also prays that since he has already superannuated, his pension may be revised and increased after grant of 2nd ACP/MACP.

3. The ground taken by the respondents of non- consideration and payment of the benefit is that the petitioner is involved in a criminal case.

4. As per the petitioner, the petitioner was entitled to get the

2026:JHHC:3324 benefit w.e.f., 04.01.2014 and the criminal case was instituted on 09.04.2014 i.e., much after the due date. As per him, the same cannot be a ground to stall the benefit which the petitioner is entitled to.

5. Considering the aforesaid submission, I direct the petitioner to file a representation before the Department of Food, Public Distribution and Consumer affairs, Govt. of Jharkhand within four weeks.

6. If it is found that the date when the petitioner was eligible to get the benefit of the 2nd ACP/MACP, there was no criminal case pending against the petitioner, the respondents will consider the same and will pass an appropriate order within six weeks thereafter. If the petitioner is found entitled the respondents will ensure payment of the benefit of 2nd ACP/MACP to the petitioner within four weeks thereafter.

7. If the claim of the petitioner is rejected, the reasons thereof should be communicated to the petitioner within the aforesaid period.

8. So far as the Transportation Allowance is concerned, the respondents will consider as to whether the petitioner is entitled for payment of Transportation Allowance or not and will pass necessary order.

9. With the aforesaid observations, this writ petition stands disposed of.

(ANANDA SEN, J.) 09.02.2026 S.K.D/Cp-2

Uploaded on 10.02.2026

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter