Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bhagwati Devi And Others vs Jinni Devi And Others
2025 Latest Caselaw 2950 Jhar

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2950 Jhar
Judgement Date : 27 February, 2025

Jharkhand High Court

Bhagwati Devi And Others vs Jinni Devi And Others on 27 February, 2025

Author: Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Bench: Anubha Rawat Choudhary
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

                             Second Appeal No. 37 of 2021
                                         With
                                 I.A. No. 2115 of 2025

            Bhagwati Devi and others                  ...     ...    Appellants
                                    Versus
            Jinni Devi and others          ...           ...        Respondents
                                    ---

CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY

---

For the Appellants : Mr. Vishal Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Lalit Kumar Yadav, Advocate

---

11/27.02.2025 I.A. No. 2115 of 2025 has been filed for framing additional substantial question of law or for reframing the substantial question of law.

2. The learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that the first substantial question of law as framed vide order dated 06.11.2023 is sought to be clarified further by the additional substantial question of law.

3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has not raised any serious objection to the interlocutory application.

4. Considering the impugned judgments and substantial question of law framed earlier, this appeal will be heard also on the following substantial question of law: -

(i) Whether the learned Trial Court as well as the Appellate Court has misinterpreted the document of title i.e. Ext. B Sale deed dated 15.02.1994 no. 3034, which is a registered document and has a presumption that it is validly executed document, and as such the onus is on the person who alleges the contrary?

(ii) Whether the entire plaint itself is hit by the provision of order VII rule 3 of the C.P.C. as the particulars of the schedule-B does not correspondents to the sale deed dated 15/12/1994 no. 3034 i.e. Ext. B executed in favour of the appellants?

5. I.A. No. 2115 of 2025 stands disposed of.

6. Post this case on 03.03.2025 under the same heading.

(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Binit

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter