Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Saibu Hembrom vs The State Of Jharkhand .... Opposite ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 7809 Jhar

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7809 Jhar
Judgement Date : 16 December, 2025

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Jharkhand High Court

Saibu Hembrom vs The State Of Jharkhand .... Opposite ... on 16 December, 2025

Author: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
                                                                   2025:JHHC:37716




                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
                      Criminal Revision No. 1202 of 2022
                                     ----

Saibu Hembrom, aged about 35 years, son of Late Lal Hembrom, resident of village -Chainpur, PO - Chainpur, PS - Chakradharpur, District - West Singhbhum .... Petitioner

-- Versus --

The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party

----

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

---

For the Petitioner :- Ms. Sumitra Kumari, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Sanjay Kr. Srivastava, Advocate For the Informant :- Mrs. Pragati Prasad, Advocate

----

07/16.12.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned

counsel appearing for the State and learned counsel appearing for the

Informant.

2. This petition has been preferred against the judgment dated

31.08.2022 passed in Criminal Appeal No.55 of 2022 whereby learned

Sessions Judge, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa has been pleased to

dismiss the appeal and affirm the judgment dated 06.07.2022 passed in

Chakradharpur P.S. Case No.05 of 2014 corresponding to G.R. Case

No.06 of 2014 and T.R. No.211 of 2022 passed by learned Sub-Divisional

Judicial Magistrate, Porahat at Chaibasa whereby the petitioner has been

convicted under Section 354 of Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to

undergo S.I. for two years for the offence punishable under Section 354

of Indian Penal Code and fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment of

fine further undergo S.I. for one month.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that now a

--1-- Criminal Revision No. 1202 of 2022 2025:JHHC:37716

good sense has been prevailed between the parties and the petitioner

and the informant are of the same village and compromise has reached

between the parties and for that I.A. No.2463 of 2024 has been filed

which is on separate affidavit. She further submits that due to

misunderstanding as there was some dispute earlier between the parties

and due to that said case has been lodged and in view of that the

compromise may kindly be allowed and the case may kindly be disposed

of.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that two courts'

concurrent findings are there.

5. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party No.2 accepts

the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and

submits that compromise has taken place between the parties and

compromise petition has been filed in the form of I.A. She submits that

both the sides have affidavited the said I.A. separately and in view of

that the matter can be disposed of.

6. In view of above and considering that both the sides are

villagers and it has been pointed out that due to earlier dispute the case

has been lodged and both the sides have compromised the matter and

I.A. has been filed for compromise. Looking into the contents of the

allegation it appears that if the compromise will be allowed it will not

affect the society and further considering the judgment of Hon'ble

Supreme Court in the cases of "Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab &

Anr." reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh and

Others vs. State of Punjab and Another reported in (2014) 6 SCC

--2-- Criminal Revision No. 1202 of 2022 2025:JHHC:37716

466 compromise petition being I.A. No.2463 of 2024 is hereby allowed

and disposed of.

7. Consequently, the judgment dated 06.07.2022 passed in

Chakradharpur P.S. Case No.05 of 2014 corresponding to G.R. Case

No.06 of 2014 and T.R. No.211 of 2022 passed by learned Sub-Divisional

Judicial Magistrate, Porahat at Chaibasa are hereby set aside.

8. In view of the above, I.A. meant for exemption from surrender

before the learned Court being I.A. No.2533 of 2024 is hereby allowed

and disposed of and the petitioner is exempted to surrender before the

learned Court.

9. The petitioner shall immediately put at liberty.

10. This Criminal Revision Petition is hereby allowed and disposed of.




                                               (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)

Dated 16.12.2025
Sangam/
Uploaded on




                                       --3--                  Criminal Revision No. 1202 of 2022
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter