Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Anil Nath Mishra vs The State Of Jharkhand
2025 Latest Caselaw 2199 Jhar

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2199 Jhar
Judgement Date : 7 August, 2025

Jharkhand High Court

Anil Nath Mishra vs The State Of Jharkhand on 7 August, 2025

Author: Ananda Sen
Bench: Ananda Sen
                                                              2025:JHHC:22809


             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                        W.P.(S) No.3157 of 2025
                                   ------

1. Anil Nath Mishra, S/o Bhola Nath Mishra, R/o House No.18, Ward No.29, R.L. Sarraph Road, Deoghar, P.O. Deoghar, P.S. Deoghar (Town), District Deoghar, Jharkhand.

2. Rakesh Chandra Bihari Lal Jha, S/o Akhileshwar Jha, R/o Ward No.27, Chatisi, Bilasi Town, P.O. B. Deoghar, P.S. Deoghar (Town), District Deoghar, Jharkhand.

3. Gyaneshwar Pandit, S/o Ganesh Pandit, R/o House No.75, Ward No.30, Dukhi Sah Lane, Jhounsagarhi, Deoghar, P.O. & P.S. Deoghar, District Deoghar, Jharkhand.

4. Renu Devi, widow of Late Sureshwar Dutt Dwari, R/o Ward No.29, Chakravarti Lane, Deoghar, P.O. Deoghar, P.S. Deoghar (Town), District Deoghar, Jharkhand.

... ... Petitioners Versus

1. The State of Jharkhand, through the Principal Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi.

2. The Director, Primary Education, School Education and Literacy Department, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi.

3. The Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar, P.O. & P.S. Deoghar, District Deoghar, Jharkhand.

4. The District Superintendent of Education, Deoghar, P.O. & P.S. Deoghar, District Deoghar, Jharkhand.

5. The Accountant General (A & E), Jharkhand, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi, Jharkhand.

... ... Respondents

------

               CORAM       : SRI ANANDA SEN, J
                                  ------
   For the Petitioner(s) :     Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, Advocate
   For the Respondent(s):      Mr. Ranjan Kumar, AC to Sr. SC-I
                               Mr. Sudarshan Shrivastava, Advocate
                                   ------

04/ 07.08.2025

Heard learned counsel representing the petitioners and

learned counsel representing the respondents.

2. It is the case of the petitioners that that petitioner Nos.1,

2 & 3 are entitled to get the notional benefit of Grade-I Pay and the

husband of petitioner No.4 is also entitled to get the same benefit,

from the date of appointment.

3. Learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that

2025:JHHC:22809

the issue has already been set at rest by several judgments of this

Court and ultimately it has been held that the clause which prohibited

the retired and deceased employees to get the said benefits, has

been struck down. He submits that the effect of striking down the

said clause is that all the employees be they superannuated or

deceased, are entitled to get the notional benefit of Grade-I Pay. He

submits that the respondents are now extending the benefits to only

those persons who are approaching this Court. He further submits

that the petitioners have filed a representation before the

Superintendent of Education, Deoghar, but no decision has yet been

taken.

4. Learned counsel representing the respondent-State

submits that if the petitioners file fresh individual representation

annexing the judgments of the High Court, their case will be

considered.

5. Considering the aforesaid submission, I direct the

petitioners to file their detailed representation before the District

Superintendent of Education, Deoghar, annexing all the documents

which they rely upon including the judgments passed by this Court

and also the orders by which similarly situated persons have been

extended the benefits by the respondents.

6. The representation must be filed within a period of four

weeks. If such representations are filed, the concerned respondents

will consider the case of the petitioners within six weeks thereafter.

7. If any adverse order is passed against the claim /

representation of the petitioners, the reasons thereof should be

communicated to the petitioners.

2025:JHHC:22809

8. The entire process must be concluded within twelve

weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order along with the

representations of the petitioners.

9. Before parting, I direct the Director, Department of

Primary Education, School Education & Literacy, Government of

Jharkhand, to look into this issue and if the decision of this Court in

W.P.(S) No.2589 of 2020 (Sudhir Narayan Dwary & Ors. Vs. The State

of Jharkhand & Ors.) and other Analogues cases, is in rem, he should

ensure that all the similarly situated persons will get the same

benefits without they being forced to approach this Court.

10. With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition stands

disposed of.

11. Let a copy of this order be sent to the Director,

Department of Primary Education, School Education & Literacy,

Government of Jharkhand.

(ANANDA SEN, J.)

Prashant.Cp-2

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter