Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9002 Jhar
Judgement Date : 5 September, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
S.A. No.56 of 2023
------
Jag Mohan Das .... .... .... Appellant
Versus
Budhram Ho @ Toto @ Jag Mohan Hesa & Others
.... .... .... Respondents
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Appellant : Mr. Abhishek Kr. Dubey, Advocate
For the Respondents : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Tiwari, SC I
Mr. Sachin Kumar, AC to SC I
------
Order No:-04 Dated:-05-09-2024
Heard the parties.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the defect No.1 pointed out by the stamp reporter is to the effect that the parentage of the respondent No.4 (d) to 4 (h) is missing in the certified copy of the judgment of lower appellate court and the certified copy of the decree under appeal. It is next submitted that the respondent Nos. 4 (d) to 4 (h) of the decree under appeal are respondent Nos.8 to 12 of this Second Appeal and they are all daughter of Late Kaluram Barik but inadvertently their parentage has not been mentioned in the cause-title of decree under appeal but perusal of the impugned order reveals that they are the daughters of Late Kaluram Barik. Hence, it is submitted that the defect No.1 pointed out by the stamp reporter be ignored.
Considering the aforesaid facts, the defect No.1 pointed out by the stamp reporter is ignored.
Learned counsel for the appellant prays for time to remove the remaining defects pointed out by the stamp reporter.
The appellant is directed to remove the remaining defects pointed out by the stamp reporter within four weeks from the date of this order, failing which, this appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Bench.
List this appeal after removal of the defects.
Animesh/ (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!